Remodelled two-storey dwelling at Waterside, Deanes Park Road, Fareham

What was proposed

The application proposed remodelling a bungalow with extensions, a porch, gable ends, increased roof height, first-floor accommodation and a rear balcony.

“REMODEL OF EXISTING DEWLLING, FIRST FLOOR EXTENSION, SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION FRONT PORCH AND REAR BALCONY”

“Description of Proposal 3.1 Planning permission is sought to remodel the existing dwelling which is currently a bungalow. The alterations include a single storey rear extension measuring 3.6 metres deep with a first-floor balcony above, front porch, front and rear gable ends. The change to the roof also include an increase of the eaves height by 1.6 metres and ridge by 1.3 metres to create first floor accommodation and form a two storey dwelling.”

Officer report

The site

The detached property lies east of Deanes Park Road, behind a private drive, with Fareham Lake to the rear and within the urban area.

“Site Description 2.1 This application relates to a detached property on the east side of Deanes Park Road with Fareham Lake running to the rear of the site.”

“The property is access by a private drive which is positioned between two property which front Deanes Park Road.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the design suited the mixed area, would not unacceptably affect neighbours and complied with Policies D1 and D2.

“The design of the development has been reviewed and considered with the surrounding neighbouring properties. Officers are of the view that there is a mix of different house design within the area, however the proposal does reflect the design of other properties in the area with the gable roof form, the material proposed (render, cladding and slate) and rear balcony.”

“Having regard to the above, and due to the mixed character of the area, Officers are of the view that the design is acceptable, and the proposal would comply with Policy D1 of the Fareham Local Plan 2037.”

Officer report

Consultation response

The Tree Officer raised no objection, subject to an agreed tree protection plan and method statement before development began.

“Tree Officer No objection subject to a tree protection method statement and tree protection plan being submitted and agreed before the development commences.”

Officer report

Objections raised

Representations raised concerns about appearance, overdevelopment, overlooking, light, privacy, noise, traffic, trees, plans and local character.

“Representations 6.1 Nineteen letters of representation have been received from sixteen different household raising the following concerns:”

“Stand out from the existing properties and not blend in • Not in keeping with the local area • Not sympathetic • Inappropriate for this development • Impact on the aesthetics for local houses and form the waters edge • Eyesore • Incongruous design and materials • Overdevelopment and impact on character • Visual impact on local landmark view • Set a precedent • Overwhelming and unsuitable for this plot • Overbearing and obstructive • Overlooking properties and balconies •…”

Officer report

Deputations

The committee received the deputations connected with the application.

The committee vote

Members voted on the officer recommendation, with eight in favour, none against and one abstention.

“Upon being proposed and seconded the officer recommendation to: -”

“Was voted on and CARRIED. (Voting: 8 in favour; 0 against; Abstention)”

Minutes

The decision

Planning permission was granted subject to the conditions, with authority delegated to the Head of Planning to modify, delete or add conditions.

“(i) GRANT planning permission, subject to: -”

“(ii) DELEGATE AUTHORITY to the Head of Planning to: -”

Minutes