50-room co-living scheme at 198-202 Fore Street, Edmonton, London N18
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Enfield Planning Committee on 17 Jun 2025.
What was proposed
The scheme included a refurbished restaurant building with a 10-bedroom HMO, a 50-room co-living building, café, co-working space and communal garden.
“PROPOSAL: Internal and external refurbishment of existing buildings at 198-202 Fore Street, including erection of an additional floor above 200-202 Fore to create additional rooms to facilitate a 10-bedroom HMO (Sui Generis), with the ground floor restaurant space to be retained (Class E).”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is a corner plot within the Fore Street Conservation Area, with existing restaurant use, HMOs, rear parking and nearby mature trees.
“The application site comprises unit numbers 198-202 Fore Street as well as land to the rear. It has a footprint area of circa 1255 sqm within the red line boundary. This site occupies a corner plot with its front elevation on Fore Street (A1010) and its flank elevation on Sterling Way, which is an exit from the adjacent North Circular Road (A406). To the rear of the site, outside the red line, is the Raynham Road car park.”
“The main pedestrian access to the site is from the front of the building on Fore Street. The site can also be accessed to the rear from Raynham Road, and the existing HMO accommodation on upper floors is currently accessed from Raynham Road via an external metal stair at the rear of the building. There is a gated area of hardstanding to the rear, off Raynham Road, which is used as vehicular parking space, and there is a row of mature trees on the adjacent car park site.”
Officer report
Earlier planning decisions
Earlier decisions established lawful HMO uses, while pre-application advice covered 50 co-living rooms, communal facilities, flexible workspace and an additional floor.
“21/00412/CEU - Use of Block A as a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) Use Class C4 – Lawful development certificate granted, 16/04/21.”
“22/02347/PREHER - The proposed development will comprise the provision of 50 co-living units including communal facilities and flexible working space with café at ground floor, and the erection of an additional floor above no. 200-202 Fore Street to provide 4 additional units – Pre-application advice issued, 27/09/22.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered that housing, accommodation quality, public facilities, heritage renovation and other benefits outweighed harm, subject to conditions and a legal agreement.
“The development would make a positive contribution to the supply of new housing in the Borough, particularly through the delivery of 50 studio rooms in large-scale purpose-built shared living accommodation. • The proposal would add variety to the mix of accommodation available in the surrounding area. • An acceptable quality of accommodation will be provided.”
“These involve heritage benefits associated with the renovation of the existing buildings at 198-202 Fore Street, which would be secured through a legal agreement requiring works to be completed prior to the occupation of the development. • The development is in a sustainable location, and it will be broadly ‘car free’, except for the provision of two disabled parking bays for the new co-living building.”
Officer report
Main concerns considered
The assessment identified harm involving neighbour light, drainage, heritage and possible tree loss, with mitigation proposed through conditions, contributions and the legal agreement.
“Having regard to the above assessment, officers take the view that, overall, the benefits of the scheme would outweigh any harm that it may cause.”
“Some loss of amenity for neighbours, particularly in terms of loss of sunlight to bedrooms at the rear of 196 and 198 Fore Street. This could be mitigated to some extent at number 198 by the provision of additional details relating to the internal refurbishment of the HMOs, which should ensure that the available natural light is optimized through interior design.”
Officer report
What members discussed
Members discussed transport, accommodation quality, employment, heritage, archaeology, plan quality, the local impact of similar units and design variation.
“In response to Members’ queries relating to sunlight/ daylight and the quality of accommodation, officers advised that light would be at an acceptable level and there were no concerns about the quality of accommodation with bedrooms and communal spaces all served by windows which provided light and ventilation.”
“Members made comments about the quality of the plans provided, concerns around the proliferation of units of this type and their impact on the local community, and a desire for more variation in the colour and design of developments.”
Minutes
The vote and decision
Members voted ten to none, with no abstentions, to grant permission subject to a legal agreement, conditions and delegated authority over their wording.
“The proposal having been put to the vote; Members voted:”
“That subject to the completion of a S106 Agreement to secure the matters covered in this report, the Head of Development Management be authorised to GRANT planning permission subject to conditions. That the Head of Development Management be granted delegated authority to finalise the wording of the S106 Agreement and agree the final wording of the conditions to cover the matters set out in the Recommendation section of this report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Enfield Planning Committee minutes, 17 June 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Enfield's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Enfield Planning Committee
- Council
- Enfield
- Date
- Tuesday 17 June 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Enfield committee decisions →
This committee's year
7 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.