Nursery to private dwelling at Cameron House Nursery, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 27 May 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to change a former nursery into one private dwelling with internal alterations, while the amended scheme removed external works.
“Listed building consent is sought for alterations associated with a planning application for a change of use from former children's nursery (Class 10) to private dwelling (Class 9).”
“The application has been amended removing the new access from the proposal and the associated external works. As a result, the application relates only to the internal alterations associated with the proposed change of use with no external works proposed.”
Officer report
The site and its history
The site is a vacant, B-listed nursery dating from about 1930, with 22 stained-glass panels and residential surroundings.
“The property is B-listed dating from circa 1930, recognised for the 22 secular stained glass panels showing children at play by William Wilson; designed for the school in 1937. Listed on 29.03.1996, LB ref. 43142. The B listed Cameron House is located to the south west of the site fronting Cameron House Avenue.”
“The site has been vacant since 2019 and is no longer in active nursery use. The surrounding area is predominantly residential in nature with Prestonfield Primary School located on the western side of Cameron House Avenue.”
Officer report
Earlier applications and history
The related application proposed the same change of use, and there was no other recent relevant history or pre-application process.
“25/04329/FUL Cameron House Nursery 9 Cameron House Avenue Edinburgh EH16 5LF Change of use from former children's nursery (Class 10) to single private dwelling (Class 9), with internal alterations and the formation of a new access from Cameron Park through the boundary wall, providing delivery /drop off point, bicycle storage, and bin storage and new access stairs to the house. No external alterations are proposed to the listed building.”
“There is no pre-application process history.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the proposal would retain the stained glass, use the existing layout and avoid harm to the building’s special interest.
“It is recommended that this application be Granted subject to the details below.”
“The proposals have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building and its setting and will not adversely impact on its special architectural and historic interest. It is acceptable with regards to Section 14 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997. There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion.”
Officer report
The main heritage issue
The building had been vacant since 2019, and officers considered a new residential use necessary to support its long-term preservation without harmful alterations.
“Historic Environment Scotland guidance on the 'Use and Adaptation of Listed Buildings' advises that the introduction of new uses to historic buildings is often necessary to secure their long-term preservation. While a change from its original use would result in some degree of impact, continued use is recognised as the most sustainable way to ensure its preservation.”
“In this instance, the building has been vacant since 2019, and its long-term future is considered to be at risk without a new use. The prolonged vacancy has resulted in deterioration of the building and has increased vandalism and general decline.”
Officer report
Other concerns raised
Contributors also mentioned future use, ownership, construction effects, traffic, drainage, infrastructure, biodiversity, antisocial behaviour and vandalism.
“- Speculation regarding future use of the building; - Ownership of boundary wall and access arrangements; - Impact of construction on neighbouring residents; - Impact on traffic and car parking; - Flood risk and drainage; - Impact on local infrastructure and services; - Impact on environment and biodiversity; - Concerns regarding antisocial behaviour and vandalism;”
Officer report
The committee decision
The committee granted planning permission subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the officer report.
“25/04330/LBC - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To GRANT planning permission subject to the conditions and informatives as set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.8 – 4A Clarence Street, Edinburgh, EH3 5AF”
Minutes
Conditions and informative
No conditions were attached to the consent, and the permitted works must start within three years of consent.
“No conditions are attached to this consent.”
“The works hereby permitted shall be commenced no later than the expiration of three years from the date of this consent.”
Officer report
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 27 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 27 May 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
247 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.