Roof raising and extensions at Bouldershaw Cottage, Stanton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by East Staffordshire Planning Committee on 24 Feb 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
Roof raised and extensions proposed
The proposal was to raise the roof ridge height, add a two storey rear extension, a single storey front infill, a first floor front extension, solar panels and roof lights.
“P/2025/01134 Raising of the ridge height of the existing roof, erection of a two storey rear extension (principal elevation), single storey front infill extension and first floor front extension and the installation of solar panels and roof lights. Bouldershaw Cottage, Sallyfield Lane, Stanton, Staffordshire, DE6 2DD The site visit was attended by Councillors A. Afsar, [name withheld], M. Holton, [name withheld], S. McKiernan, M. Slater, C. Smedley and C. Whittaker.”
Minutes
Councillors, the parish and the agent speak
A ward councillor and a Stanton Parish Council member spoke on the application, followed by the applicant's agent, after an officer presentation.
Members discuss the application
Members held discussions on the application before a motion to refuse was put forward and seconded.
“A motion was put forward by Councillor C. Whittaker, which had been duly seconded by Councillor Mrs J. Jones to REFUSE the application.”
Minutes
Harm to the conservation area
The conservation area appraisal describes an important vernacular visual cluster including the cottage, whose haphazard building line contrasts with later infill development.
“1) The Stanton Conservation Area Appraisal notes the attractiveness of the original haphazard building line along the lanes; the informal angles and irregularity of the original building lines which contrast sharply with the grain of the 20th century infill development which runs parallel to the lanes and has a “mechanistic appearance” which has harmed the character and appearance of the village conservation area.”
Minutes
Harm to a non-designated heritage asset
The extension and raised ridge height would severely harm the historic and architectural interest of the cottage as a non-designated heritage asset and the character of the streetscape.
“2) The application scheme in relation to Boldershaw Cottage will result the substantive extension and alteration of the existing relatively modest vernacular cottage including a proposed increase in the ridge height and the resultant cumulative visual impact of these works would be severely detrimental to the historic and architectural interest of this non-designated heritage asset and would be to the severe detriment of the character and appearance of the streetscape of…”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
Minutes
- The Stanton Conservation Area Appraisal notes the attractiveness of the original haphazard building line along the lanes; the informal angles and irregularity of the original building lines which contrast sharply with the grain of the 20th century infill development which runs parallel to the lanes and has a “mechanistic appearance” which has harmed the character and appearance of the village cons
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- East Staffordshire Planning Committee minutes, 24 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of East Staffordshire's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- East Staffordshire
- Date
- Tuesday 24 February 2026
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- East Staffordshire committee decisions →
This committee's year
10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.