72-home outline scheme at Land To The South Of Harepath Hill, Seaton

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by East Devon Planning Committee on 9 Feb 2026.

25/1788/MOUTApproved

What was proposed

An outline scheme sought up to 72 homes, access from Harepath Road, public open space and associated infrastructure, with other details reserved.

“Proposal: Outline application (approval sought for means of access) for residential development comprising of up to 72 dwellings, the formation of vehicular and pedestrian access from Harepath Road, public open space and other associated infrastructure…”

“The proposal seeks outline planning permission for up to 72 dwellings. Approval is sought now for the vehicular access point with all other matters being reserved for later approval.”

Officer report

The site

The site comprises undeveloped fields with hedgerows and trees on Seaton’s northern edge, outside the built-up boundary and within the Green Wedge.

“The site is located on the northern edge of Seaton and is on land outside of the Built-Up Area Boundary (BUAB), and also within the Green Wedge.”

“The site is currently comprised of undeveloped fields, with intervening hedgerows and trees. It would bridge the gap from Colyford Road to Harepath Road and extend up Harepath Hill to the A3052. The site would abut existing residential development to the south.”

Officer report

What officers advised

Officers recommended approval because housing and affordable housing benefits, biodiversity gains and sustainable development outweighed identified policy, landscape and agricultural land conflicts.

“In terms of benefits, the development would provide housing at a time that the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, and where the shortfall is significant. Furthermore, it would deliver 25% affordable housing (up to a maximum of 30.5 affordable homes) in an area where there is a need for 167 affordable homes and when affordable housing delivery across the District is behind target, in the context of a worsening affordability index.”

“Taking the above into consideration, the development would provide social benefits of significant weight. Biodiversity interests would be not only maintained but there would also be a net gain in biodiversity. While there would be some landscape harm the overall balance (considering the definition of sustainable development in the NPPF which stands on 3 pillars: economic, social and environmental) is positive and the development can therefore be said to be sustainable.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee adopted the assessment and approved the application subject to a Section 106 agreement, an additional phasing condition and water conservation measures.

“RESOLVED: The Shadow Habitat Regulations Assessment be adopted as EDDC’s Appropriate Assessment. Approved in accordance with officer recommendation subject to completion of S106 Agreement and; (i) Additional phasing condition as presented by the officer. (ii) Amend Condition 2 to add ‘for each phase’ at the end of the last sentence.”

Minutes

Sources

  • East Devon Planning Committee minutes, 9 February 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of East Devon's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
East Devon
Date
Monday 9 February 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

20 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →