Frontage canopies at Kika Beach Club, Weymouth

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Dorset Western and Southern Area Planning Committee on 29 Jan 2026.

P/LBC/2025/02899Refused

What was proposed

The application sought to retain canopies and associated frontage works for use within the business premises.

“Application Number: P/LBC/2025/02899 Webpage: https://planning.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/ Site address: Kika Beach Club 52-53 The Esplanade Weymouth DT4 8DG Proposal: Retain canopies and associated works to frontage of Kika Beach Club for use within the business premises…”

“Description of development 5.1 Retain canopies and associated works to frontage of Kika Beach Club for use within the business premises. The canopies are physically attached to the listed building and as such require listed building consent.”

Officer report

The site

The site includes two Grade II listed buildings, a highway pavement and an outdoor seating area on The Esplanade.

“Description of site 4.1 The application site is located fronting onto The Esplanade in Weymouth Town Centre and is approximately 30m southeast of the highway junction with New Street. This is a secondary shopping frontage area of Weymouth's Esplanade which is predominantly characterised by the historic Georgian period seafront.”

Officer report

Related applications

A related full planning application for the canopies was under consideration, alongside listed building and full applications for adjoining premises.

“Background and relevant planning history 6.1 Members attention is drawn to the live applications no. P/LBC/2025/01317 & P/FUL/2025/01316 in relation to the adjoining 54-55 The Esplanade (known as The Nook Cocktail Club) premises which propose to retain canopies and associated works to frontage of The Nook Cocktail Club for use within the business premises. The relevant planning history for the application site is set out below. Application no.”

“List of constraints Within the Weymouth Town Centre Conservation Area (statutory duty to preserve or enhance the significance of heritage assets under the Planning (Listed Buildings & Conservation Areas) Act 1990).”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended refusal because the development would cause heritage harm that public benefits did not outweigh and lacked clear justification.

“Conclusion 15.1 The application is considered to be unacceptable in heritage impact terms, given the uncharacteristic design to the site and the area, which is considered to result in significant less than substantial harm to the designated heritage assets, and the level of harm is not outweighed by public benefits and is without convincing justification.”

“Recommendation 16.1 Refuse listed building consent for the reason set out below: The proposed development would result in significant less than substantial harm to the heritage significance of the listed buildings within the application site, the Weymouth Town Centre Conservation Area and less than substantial harm to the setting of the adjacent listed buildings.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The conservation officer found the design harmful and incongruous, while the town council supported it for economic development.

“Consultees 1. Dorset Council Conservation Officer It is concluded that the proposal due to its clutter, concealment of views of the listed buildings, would detrimentally impact the architectural significance of the listed buildings, the setting of neighbouring listed buildings and the special character and local distinctiveness of the Weymouth Town Centre Conservation Area.”

“Furthermore, the proposal adds visual clutter and a dense design which creates harm to the wider contribution made to the street scene and the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. The character and appearance of the Weymouth Town Conservation Area is defined by its historic buildings, traditional materials, and cohesive historic townscape.”

Officer report

Public comments

The civic society was concerned that barriers and canopies would enclose the frontage and harm the historic terrace’s setting.

“Representations received Weymouth Civic Society We have concerns about these proposals, which would result in further additions to the barriers around the forecourts, effectively enclosing the space at the frontage, and affecting the setting of this historic Georgian terrace of buildings. We would ask that consideration is given to the particular context of these two properties, immediately adjacent to 51 The Esplanade (Harveys), and the effect on its setting.”

Officer report

Heritage impact

The canopies were considered modern, discordant structures that obscured the listed buildings and harmed the conservation area and nearby buildings’ settings.

“Impact on heritage assets Weymouth Town Centre Conservation Area (The Esplanade sub area)(CA) 14.7 The character and appearance of the CA is defined by its historic buildings, traditional materials, and cohesive historic townscape. The introduction of non-traditional designed canopies and structures would be incongruous with these defining characteristics of the CA.”

“It is considered the development appears as visual clutter that is discordant in design to the heritage setting and adversely alters, disrupts and erodes the setting of the designated heritage assets. Moreover, the canopies and structures located to the front of the site, significantly obscure and disrupt views of the ground floor of the buildings.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

Listed building consent was refused because the heritage harm was not outweighed by public benefits and lacked clear and convincing justification.

“Summary of Recommendation: Refuse. Decision: That listed building consent be refused for the following reason: The proposed development would result in significant less than substantial harm to the heritage significance of the listed buildings within the application site, the Weymouth Town Centre Conservation Area and less than substantial harm to the setting of the adjacent listed buildings.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The resolution gives these reasons:

  1. The proposed development would result in significant less than substantial harm to the heritage significance of the listed buildings within the application site, the Weymouth Town Centre Conservation Area and less than substantial harm to the setting of the adjacent listed buildings. The harm to these designated heritage assets is not outweighed by public benefits and is without clear and convinci
Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Dorset Western and Southern Area Planning Committee minutes, 29 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Dorset's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Dorset
Date
Thursday 29 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

15 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →