Up to 95 homes at Land North Of Tops Nursery, Broadway Road, Mickleton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Cotswold Planning and Licensing Committee on 13 May 2026.
What was proposed
The outline application sought demolition of existing buildings and up to 95 homes, with access and infrastructure; detailed layout and design were reserved.
“Outline planning application for demolition of existing buildings and for up to 95 dwellings with associated access and infrastructure, all other matters reserved at Land North of Tops Nursery Broadway Road Mickleton Gloucestershire…”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The 5.5-hectare site included a garden centre, horticultural buildings, woodland, orchards and agricultural fields beside Mickleton’s development boundary.
“The application site is located outside, but adjacent to, Mickleton Development Boundary as designated in the Cotswold District Local Plan 2011-2031 The aforementioned boundary extends along the north-eastern boundary of the application site.”
Officer report
What consultees said
Highways, drainage, archaeology, water, environmental health and trees raised no objections subject to conditions, while biodiversity information was still required.
“Gloucestershire County Council Highways: No objection subject to conditions.”
“Thames Water: ' Thames Water has identified an inability of the existing water network infrastructure to accommodate the needs of this development proposal.' A condition relating to water supply has therefore been recommended.”
Officer report
Who spoke
Speakers included a parish councillor, an objector, the agent and a ward member, who addressed infrastructure, housing, sustainability and cumulative growth.
What members discussed
Members discussed water supply, cumulative growth, infrastructure, affordable and smaller homes, low-carbon design, accessibility, woodland and contributions.
“Members questions Members of the Committee asked a series of questions and noted that: • Thames Water had identified potential water supply pressure issues and requested a condition requiring a phased infrastructure plan to be agreed with the applicant to ensure any necessary upgrades are delivered.”
“Member comments • Support was noted for the developer’s approach to low-carbon housing, including solar panels and air source heat pumps, with a request that greater battery storage provision be considered. • Request was made for enhanced accessibility standards, including a higher proportion of M4(3) wheelchair-accessible homes.”
Minutes
The vote
A motion to permit the application, subject to biodiversity, energy information and a Section 106 agreement, was proposed, seconded and agreed.
“Councillor Juliet Layton proposed PERMITTING the application subject to no objection from Biodiversity Officer, an Energy and Renewable Energy Statement at reserved matters stage and the completion of a S106 legal agreement covering affordable housing, self-build/ custom build housing, financial contributions to Biodiversity Net Gain monitoring, secondary education and school transport and library services and Councillor Julia Judd seconded the proposal.”
Minutes
Sources
- Cotswold Planning and Licensing Committee minutes, 13 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Cotswold's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Cotswold
- Date
- Wednesday 13 May 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Cotswold committee decisions →
This committee's year
26 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.