Shopfront signs at 68 North Street, Chichester
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Chichester Planning Committee on 11 Jun 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought consent for a non-illuminated fascia sign and a blackboard for the shop.
“The application seeks advertisement consent for the display of 1 no. fascia sign (non-illuminated) and 1 no. black board.”
“The proposed fascia board forms the main signage for the site measuring 3.05 metres in length and 0.64 metres in height. In a centred position on a grey background, yellow graphics are proposed, depicting a bunch of grapes and "The Wine Shop" in capital letters. Raised Perspex white lettering measuring approximately 20 cm in height and 1.07 m in length, raised on 12 mm lugs is proposed on top, depicting the name of the business "CAVAVIN" in capital letters.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The property is a Grade II listed building in the city-centre conservation area, surrounded mainly by shops, services and restaurants with varied signage.
“The application property is a Grade II Listed building, first listed on 08-Oct-1971 and described as:”
“The site was last used as a betting shop. The character of the surrounding area is predominantly commercial, with the majority comprising of shops, services and restaurants. The surrounding retail units have a variety of existing signage, which predominantly take the form of branded fascia and some hanging signs.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
The property has a history of permissions and refusals involving shopfronts, advertisements, alterations, changes of use and residential development.
“97/00460/FUL PER Change of use of rear part of shop to tea room. Alterations to courtyard elevations.”
“04/02447/FUL PER106 Change of use of part of property from A1 to residential creation of 5 no. flats and new first floor extension to rear.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the signs would be visually sympathetic, improve the shopfront, protect heritage interests and avoid public-safety problems.
“The proposed signage, whilst not meeting all requirements set out in the CDC Shopfront and Advertisement Guidance would be appropriate within its setting, being cohesive and visually sympathetic with the surrounding advertisements seen along North Steet and would not detract from the special interest of the Conservation Area.”
“Section 3 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements (England) Regulations 2007 (as amended) permits the display of advertisements where they do not, inter alia, adversely impact upon the interests of public safety.”
Officer report
Consultation and objections
The parish council and conservation advisory committee objected to the raised lettering, graphics and other design details, while no third-party representations were initially recorded.
“Please note that all representations are summarised. Comments can be viewed in full on the Council's public access system, and the latest comments from the Parish Council are provided at Appendix A to this report.”
“Elements of the proposal do not comply with the CDC Shopfront Design Guidance; the raised lettering and the background graphics and extraneous text on the…”
Officer report
Later support
Ten further representations supporting the application were received before the committee meeting.
“[name withheld] presented the report. He drew attention to the Agenda Update Sheet which included an additional comment from CDC Economic Development Service; a third-party comment and a further comment from the applicant.”
“In addition, since the publication of the agenda a further 10 representations had all been received and were in support of the application.”
Minutes
What members discussed
Members had no comments or questions and moved directly to the recommendation.
“The Committee had no comments or questions and moved straight to the recommendation.”
Minutes
The vote
The committee voted to support the officer recommendation to permit the application.
“Following a vote, the Committee agreed to support the report recommendation to Permit.”
Minutes
The final decision
The application was permitted subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the report.
“Resolved; Permit, subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the report.”
Minutes
Conditions and informatives
The approved signs must follow the approved plans, use matt-finish acrylic, and require listed building consent before work starts.
“2) Notwithstanding any indication on the approved plans and documents, the acrylic elements of the proposal must be matt finish.”
“2) The applicant is reminded that no work may commence on site until the necessary Listed Building Consent has been granted.”
Officer report
Sources
- Chichester Planning Committee minutes, 11 June 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Chichester's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Chichester Planning Committee
- Council
- Chichester
- Date
- Wednesday 11 June 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Chichester committee decisions →