Two-storey home extension at 623 Sheffield Road, Sheepbridge, Chesterfield

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Chesterfield Planning Committee on 26 Jan 2026.

CHE/25/00616/HOUApproved

What was proposed

The applicant sought to replace the existing single-storey side and rear extension with a two-storey extension providing a larger kitchen and an additional bedroom.

“Planning permission is sought to demolish the existing single storey side/rear extension and to replace this with a two storey extension. This would be to in-fill the existing footprint of the space of the existing side porch and then raise the extension to match the eaves height, angle of the roof pitch of the main dwelling and then increase the eaves and ridge of the existing two storey section.”

“The proposal would use matching stone and tiles and would have an entrance door and side windows in the entrance area and a window in the rear elevation on the first floor. The scheme would facilitate a larger kitchen and an additional bedroom.”

Officer report

The site

The application concerns a two-storey semi-detached stone dwelling beside a nursery, open fields, railway tracks and other housing.

“This application relates to a two storey semi-detached dwelling on the north-western side of a pair of matching dwellings. It is on the edge of a residential area, and the pair of dwellings have a nursery and its ancillary land to the east, open fields to the north and train tracks to the south (beyond a road), with a housing area to the eastern side of the nursery site.”

“The existing dwellings are two storey, stone built, pitched roofed houses, with smaller two storey side sections and porches to the front/side. No.623 also has a dilapidated flat roofed single storey extension to the rear side, the adjoining dwelling also has a comparable rear/side extension.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers considered the proposal acceptable overall and recommended permission subject to conditions.

“CONCLUSION 9.1 Overall the proposal is considered to be acceptable in accordance with the above mentioned policies of the Local Plan. RECOMMENDATION”

“It is therefore recommended that the application be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:”

Officer report

Main planning issues

The amended roof design matched the dwelling, while officers found no significant effects on visual character, neighbours’ amenity or highway safety.

“The scheme has been amended so the roof design is comparable to the style of the existing dwelling to better reflect on the characteristics of the existing dwelling. This proposal would match the eaves, roof angle and materials of the existing dwelling, and it is considered that it would not cause significant adverse impacts on the visual amenity and character of the area. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of policy Local Plan policy CLP20.”

“Local Plan policy CLP14 states that development will be expected to have an acceptable impact on the amenity of users and neighbours. The Council’s SPD ‘Successful Places’ provides further guidance in respect of privacy, day light and sunlight, overshadowing and external amenity space.”

Officer report

Committee decision

Councillors moved and seconded the officer recommendation, which was upheld and permission was granted subject to the report’s conditions.

“It was moved by Councillor Stone and seconded by Councillor Caulfield that the officer recommendation be upheld.”

“That the officer recommendation be upheld, and the application be GRANTED subject to the conditions outlined in the officer’s report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Chesterfield Planning Committee minutes, 26 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Chesterfield's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Monday 26 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

32 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →