Two-storey side extension at 9 South Bank, Cheltenham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Cheltenham Planning Committee on 16 Oct 2025.

25/01043/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed a two-storey side extension, set back from the front and including parking beneath its first-floor section.

“DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSAL 1.1 The application site is located on South Bank, within St Marks Ward, and comprises an end-of-terrace, two-storey dwelling with a detached garage to the rear and off-street parking to the side. The dwelling is constructed in brick, with a pitched concrete-tiled roof and white uPVC windows and doors. The property is not listed, and the site is not situated within a Conservation Area.”

Officer report

Planning history

Earlier applications concerned redevelopment of the existing site for housing, including permission for 60 dwellings and garages.

“Relevant Planning History: 00/00055/REM 19th March 2001 APREM Construction of 60 dwellings and garages and associated highway works (in accordance with agents letter dated 18 October 2000) 98/00312/OUT 30th April 1999 PER Redevelopment Of Existing Site For Housing (Outline) 98/00380/PO 30th July 1998 REF Part Redevelopment Of Existing Site For Housing (Outline) (Revised Scheme)”

Officer report

Highways response

The Highway Authority raised no objection, finding no unacceptable highway safety or severe congestion impact, subject to a pedestrian access gate.

“I am now content that the level of car parking for this extension is acceptable based on the revised plans received and forming part of this application, However, by removing the access to the existing garage, the ability to provide covered and secure bicycle storage facilities will also be removed, It is not desirable or practical to wheel a wet and muddy cycle through the ground floor of the dwelling.”

“The Highway Authority has undertaken a robust assessment of the planning application. Based on the analysis of the information submitted the Highway Authority concludes that there would not be an unacceptable impact on Highway Safety or a severe impact on congestion. There are no justifiable grounds on which an objection could be maintained…”

Officer report

Public representations

Eight letters were sent, but no comments, objections, supporting representations or general comments were received.

“Number of letters sent 8 Total comments received 0 Number of objections 0 Number of supporting 0 General comment 0”

Officer report

The decision

The committee voted unanimously to grant the application.

“Voted UNANIMOUSLY to grant the application.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Cheltenham Planning Committee minutes, 16 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Cheltenham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Cheltenham
Date
Thursday 16 October 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →