Five-bedroom HMO at 47 Trinity Road, Llanelli

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Carmarthenshire Planning Committee on 4 Dec 2025.

PL/09751RefusedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application sought to change a three-bedroom dwelling into a five-bedroom HMO with rear bike storage and no external alterations to the main dwelling.

“Application Type Full planning permission Proposal A change of use from a C3 dwelling house to a C4 House in multiple occupancy (HMO) (5 bedrooms) with bike storage at the rear…”

Officer report

The site and its history

The site is on an established residential street within Llanelli’s development limits, surrounded mainly by traditional detached and semi-detached homes; no previous applications or decisions exist.

“Trinity Road is a well-established residential street characterised predominantly by detached and semi-detached dwellings of traditional design and scale, set within modest plots with front and rear gardens. The surrounding area has a cohesive residential character with a mix of long-standing owner-occupied homes and some rented accommodation.”

“Trinity Road is a well-established residential street characterised predominantly by detached and semi-detached dwellings of traditional design and scale, set within modest plots with front and rear gardens. The surrounding area has a cohesive residential character with a mix of long-standing owner-occupied homes and some rented accommodation.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval, considering the proposal compliant with local and national policies after assessing its scale, accommodation, character, parking and amenity effects.

“Each planning application is determined on its own merits, based on local and national planning policies. The approval of this specific HMO, which is considered compliant with Policies H3 and GP1 due to its modest scale, maintenance of character, and provision of acceptable accommodation, does not automatically "open the door" for numerous other conversions.”

“After careful consideration of the scheme as submitted it is concluded on balance that the proposal is compliant with all the policies of the Carmarthenshire Local Development Plan (2014) and the relevant national policies, the application is recommended for approval…”

Officer report

What residents said

Residents raised concerns about policy conflict, parking, HMO concentration, antisocial behaviour, noise, waste, vulnerable people, community cohesion and local infrastructure.

“Predominance of families with children and elderly residents • Many elderly residents have lived in the area for decades • Concerns about elderly residents feeling unsafe, particularly after dark • Blue Badge holders experiencing difficulties with parking access • Impact on those with limited mobility requiring proximity to homes for daily activities • Children playing in gardens and using local parks and schools • Loss of peace and stability for those in retirement,…”

“Uncertainty about who will be residing in the property • References to concerns about asylum seekers and foreign nationals • Questions about vetting of occupants and criminal backgrounds • Specific concerns about the safety of women and children • Fear and uneasiness within the community • Residents not feeling safe leaving homes or bringing family members to visit…”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee resolved to confirm refusal of the application and agreed reasons concerning residential intensification, HMO concentration, parking and highway safety.

“The Committee reviewed the evidence and resolved to confirm the refusal of the application and agree the refusal reasons outlined in the report that were based on the comments made by the Committee:”

“The proposal is contrary to Policy TR3 of the Carmarthenshire Local Development Plan in that it fails to demonstrate that adequate off-street parking and transport arrangements can be provided for the increased number of occupants associated with the development. The shortfall in provision is likely to intensify existing on-street parking pressures and could result in conditions detrimental to highway safety and the free flow of traffic in the surrounding area.”

Minutes

Why refusal was decided

The committee considered the area saturated and found that transient occupancy would harm the street’s character, neighbours’ wellbeing, housing balance and traffic conditions.

“The proposal is contrary to Policy GP1 of the Carmarthenshire Local Development Plan in that it would result in an intensification of residential activity through the introduction of high-density, transient occupancy in an already saturated area.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “The committee’s decision” and “Why refusal was decided”.

Sources

  • Carmarthenshire Planning Committee minutes, 4 December 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Carmarthenshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 4 December 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

23 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 8 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →