Six flats and commercial space at 73 - 74 Central Parade, Herne Bay

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Canterbury Planning Committee on 23 Jun 2026.

CA/25/01844Approved

What was proposed

A four-storey building would replace existing buildings, providing six flats above commercial space, including four two-bedroom and two three-bedroom flats.

“Full planning permission is sought for the erection of a four-storey building with commercial at ground floor level and 6 residential flats at upper floor levels, following the demolition of the existing buildings. The proposed development would include 4 x 2-bed flats and 2 x 3-bed flats.”

“This is an amended scheme to the extant planning permission CA//19/00296, which included the demolition of the host buildings and the redevelopment of the site with a four-storey building with a commercial unit at ground floor level and 6 flats above, alongside the wider Council redevelopment of the Beach Street Car Park to the rear.”

Officer report

The site

The vacant site contains two buildings in Herne Bay town centre, within the conservation area, near listed buildings and in Flood Zone 3.

“The application site comprises a three-storey building (No. 74) and a two-storey building (No. 73) located along the southern side of Central Parade in Herne Bay, with rear access to the site available from Beach Street.”

“The site is located within Herne Bay Town Centre and is identified as a Development Opportunity Site in the Herne Bay Area Action Plan (HBAAP). It is located within the Herne Bay Conservation Area and within the setting of the Grade II listed Herne Bay Clock Tower on the opposite side of the street to the north-east, as well as the Grade II listed drinking fountain a short distance along the seafront to the west. It is also within Flood Zone 3.”

Officer report

Earlier permissions

Earlier permissions covered flats, commercial space and wider redevelopment, with the 2019 permission remaining extant after ground works were completed.

“CA//07/00485 - Demolition of warehouse and number 73, erection of 13 flats with ground floor retail use. Planning permission granted 17/09/2007”

“CA//19/00296 - Proposed mixed-use development comprising a four-storey block of ground floor commercial space with 6no residential units above (plots 28-33); a three- storey block of 9no apartments (plots 19-27); a three-storey block of 10no apartments incorporating ground floor artists' studio spaces (plots 9-18); a two-storey block of 2no apartments (plots 7-8); and a terrace block of 6no three-storey town-houses (plots 1- 6); together with associated parking, following…”

Officer report

What consultees said

consultees raised no objections overall, with conditions or mitigation requested for flooding, ecology, highways, environmental health, heritage, design and open space.

“CCC Environmental Health – No objections, subject to conditions.”

“CCC Open Space – No objections, subject to financial contribution to open space projects.”

Officer report

What residents said

Eight representations objected to the design, height, conservation-area impact, listed buildings, daylight, parking and use of the flats, while supporting development in principle.

“Design of proposed building is out of keeping with the area and adjacent buildings…”

“Proposed building is too tall • Out of keeping with conservation area • Detrimental impact on neighbouring listed buildings • Development would set a precedent for other three gaps on the sea front to be developed in the same way • Loss of light to neighbouring flats • Local architect should have been used • New flats should be rented to local people • No car parking provided will increase on-street parking demand • Supportive of principle of development…”

Officer report

The committee vote

The proposal was agreed unanimously, with nine councillors voting for it and none against or abstaining.

“When put to a vote the proposal was AGREED.”

“For the proposal (9): Councillors Prentice, Bothwell, Buckman, Carnac, Dixey, Edwards, McKenzie, Smith, Thomas Against the proposal (0): Abstained from voting (0):”

Minutes

The decision

Planning permission was granted as proposed, with condition 9 amended to require details and samples of the balustrades, cornice and string course.

“A proposal was put that planning permission be GRANTED as described in the above application with the addition of condition 9 being amended to require details and samples of the balustrades, cornice and string course; and with the following informatives attached:”

“The applicant is advised to consider the potential for the installation of a hedgehog drinking hole at the site as part of details to be submitted to discharge the ecological enhancements and landscaping conditions.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Canterbury Planning Committee minutes, 23 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Canterbury's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Canterbury
Date
Tuesday 23 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

21 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →