Extensions and roof changes at Little Acre, Highstead, Chislet
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Canterbury Planning Committee on 16 Sept 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought front and side extensions, a rear extension, a higher roof, a chimney and changes to external materials.
“Full planning permission is sought for a two-storey front and side extension, single story rear extension together with increase in roof height, addition of a chimney and external material changes.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a detached two-storey property in the Highstead Conservation Area, set back from two streets and screened by trees on two sides.
“The application site is located on Boyden Gate Hill in Highstead and is a two-storey detached property. The site is also within The Highstead (Chislet) Conservation Area. The site also has an access fronting onto Highstead as well as onto Boyden Gate Hill and is set back from both streets. Trees screen the site on the south-east and north- east sides of the plot although the dwelling would be visible within thee conservation area.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval subject to safeguarding conditions because the design, living conditions and archaeological effects were acceptable.
“For the reasons set out above, it is recommended that planning permission be granted subject to appropriate safeguarding conditions.”
“It is therefore recommended that planning permission be granted, subject to safeguarding conditions.”
Officer report
What residents said
Six representations objected to the design, overbearing impact, privacy, tree, roof lines, extraction noise and spice-kitchen aromas.
“A site notice was placed in the vicinity, an advert was placed in the local press and neighbouring properties received letters informing them of the application. Six representations were received, objecting to the application on the following grounds:”
“The design, style and materials are out of character with the area • Overbearing impact • Loss of privacy • Extension is close to an existing Walnut Tree in the grounds of Walnut Tree Farm • Proposed roof lines out of character with existing dwelling • The level of extraction required for the proposed spice room may impact on levels of noise pollution • Invasive aroma from spice kitchen Chislet Parish Council - no objection…”
Officer report
The committee vote
The proposal was agreed, with nine councillors voting for, two against and one abstention.
“When put to a vote, the proposal was AGREED.”
“For the proposal (9): Councillors Bothwell, Buckman, Dixey, Edwards, Forrester, McKenzie, Old, D Smith, N Smith…”
Minutes
The decision
Planning permission was granted, with a drawing added to condition 2 showing pad foundations to protect nearby walnut-tree roots.
“A proposal was put that planning permission be GRANTED for the development described in the above application, with the addition of the drawing to condition 2 showing the extension to be built on pad foundations to protect the tree roots of the nearby walnut tree.”
Minutes
Sources
- Canterbury Planning Committee minutes, 16 September 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Canterbury's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Canterbury Planning Committee
- Council
- Canterbury
- Date
- Tuesday 16 September 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Canterbury committee decisions →
This committee's year
6 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.