Foodstore with nine flats at Hoplands Farm, Hersden, Canterbury

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Canterbury Planning Committee on 11 Nov 2025.

CA/22/01648Approved

The site and surroundings

The site was vacant land within the wider Hoplands Farm development, near housing, a medical centre, nursery, shops and environmentally protected areas.

“The application site forms the northern central section of the wider Hoplands Farm development site. It is an open, mostly rectangular area of vacant land covering an area of 0.35 hectares.”

“The application site forms part of the wider Hoplands development site (originally granted approval in 2017), to the north of the site is the linear park/landscaped area, the A28 road and the main residential area of Hersden. Immediately to the south is the medical centre and nursery approved under Reserved Matters applications. To the east of the site is land consented for a dentist practice and convenience store.”

Officer report

Earlier permissions

Earlier permissions covered the wider neighbourhood extension, a foodstore and convenience retail, a dentist, a medical centre and a nursery.

“CA/16/00404 - Outline planning application for a neighbourhood extension for the creation of up to 250 houses including affordable housing, neighbourhood centre (comprising Class A1 foodstore (400sq.m), Class D1 medical centre (380sq.m), Class D1 dentist (150sq.m), Class A1 pharmacy (150sq.m), Class D1 nursery (120sq.m) and Class A1 convenience retail (360sq.m)), commercial estate (comprising Class B1 business floorspace (up to 5572sq.m), Class D1 apprenticeship centre…”

“CA/21/01059 - Application for approval of reserved matters relating to layout, scale, appearance, and landscaping for the erection of two units comprising 400sqm food store, 327sqm convenience retail and 150sqm dentist with associated parking and landscaping, pursuant to outline planning permission CA//16/00404/OUT. Approved in February 2022.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval subject to a legal agreement and conditions, citing housing benefits, a suitable location and limited harm that would not outweigh those benefits.

“The development will deliver 9 dwellings and the retail store. The proposal falls within the overall parameters of the original outline planning permission and is located within the neighbourhood centre of the wider Hoplands development site. The proposal is not considered to conflict materially with the Local Plan and is capable of being policy compliant with the Local Plan through the use of conditions.”

“For this reason, the application is recommended for approval subject to the conditions listed at the end of this report and a section 106 legal agreement to secure the obligations set out in this report.”

Officer report

Objections received

The parish council objected because of insufficient parking and concerns about anti-social behaviour; no other public responses were received.

“Letters were sent to neighbouring occupiers; an advert was placed in a local newspaper and a site notice was displayed in the vicinity of the site. No public responses have been received.”

“Hersden Parish Council - Objects to the development on the basis that insufficient parking is provided and anti-social behaviour.”

Officer report

Committee amendments

Members proposed adding security and surveillance details to one condition and requiring an odour assessment before development started.

“An amendment to condition 15 to include the submission of a security and surveillance for approval, including CCTV coverage of public and communal areas, visibility levels in external areas and access control measures for communal and residential entrances (along with their maintenance and monitoring).”

“The addition of a condition that ‘No development shall commence until an odour assessment has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.”

Minutes

The vote

The proposal was agreed, with eleven members voting for it, none against and two abstentions.

“When put to a vote, the proposal was AGREED.”

“For the proposal (11): Councillors Buckman, Dixey, Edwards, Harvey, Forrester, Jones, McKenzie, Old, Prentice, Naomi Smith and Thomas…”

Minutes

The decision

Planning permission was granted for the foodstore and nine apartments, subject to the stated amendments, legal agreement and safeguarding conditions.

“Recommendation: That authority be given to the Head of Planning & Health to grant planning permission, subject to the completion of a legal agreement securing the obligations set out in this report and safeguarding conditions…”

“A proposal was put that planning permission be GRANTED for the development described in the above application with:”

Minutes

Sources

  • Canterbury Planning Committee minutes, 11 November 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Canterbury's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Canterbury
Date
Tuesday 11 November 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →