Accessible tarmac footpath at Hagley Field, Rugeley
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Cannock Chase Planning Control Committee on 4 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
A 2-metre-wide tarmac footpath would replace the existing earth and stone path, raised above ground level because the site regularly floods.
“CH/16/139 - Construction of scheme of flood alleviation including the creation of an earth embankment, laying out of a vehicular maintenance track, footpath diversion, landscaping, provision of replacement sports pitches and associated development (AMENDED PLANS). Approved 26th June 2016. Site and Surroundings The application site relates to an existing earth and stone path traversing the Hagley playing fields, to the rear of Rugeley Leisure Centre.”
“These works are identified as Phase 1 of improvement works, Phases 2 and 3 will involve resurfacing the existing vehicular access extending from the Leisure Centre car park into the field and connecting with the existing tarmac pad. Planning Policy…”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the proposal would improve an existing pedestrian route and would not cause significant harm to acknowledged interests.
“Planning Balance and the Weighing Exercise 4.9.1 Your Officers confirm that the proposal is for improvement works to an existing pedestrian access route. As such, Officers give this matter significant weight. Your Officers confirm that there are no statutory objections from the Highway Authority, the LLFA and standing advice from the EA has been reviewed. As such, great weight is afforded this matter in the planning balance.”
“In respect to all matters of acknowledged interest and policy tests it is considered that the proposal, subject to the attached conditions, would not result in any significant harm to acknowledged interests and is therefore considered to be in accordance with the Development Plan.”
Officer report
Public representations
The application was publicised by neighbour letters, but no letters of representation were received.
“Non-Statutory Consultees None. Response to Publicity The application has been advertised by neighbour letter. No letters of representation have been received. Relevant Planning History…”
Officer report
Committee consideration
The Planning Officer presented photographs and plans of the proposal to the committee.
“CH/25/0344, Hagley Field with access from Rugeley Leisure Centre- works to improve accessibility along existing footpath Considerationwasthengiven to the report of the Development and Policy Manager (Item 5.48- 5.60(presented by the Planning Officer). The Planning Officer provided a presentation to the Committee outlining the application showing photographs and plans of the proposals.”
Minutes
The committee decision
The committee approved the application subject to the conditions in the report and the reasons outlined there.
“Planning Control Committee 04/02/2626 Resolved: That theapplication be approved subject to the conditions contained in the report for the reasons outlined therein. The meeting closed at4.10pm. ________________________ Chair…”
Minutes
Sources
- Cannock Chase Planning Control Committee minutes, 4 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Cannock Chase's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Cannock Chase
- Date
- Wednesday 4 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Cannock Chase committee decisions →
This committee's year
10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.