33 affordable homes and shop at Land At Winding Wheel Lane Penallta, Ystrad Mynach
Summary of planning committee decision
Deferred by Caerphilly Planning Committee on 11 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed 33 affordable apartments, a retail unit, access, parking, amenity areas and green infrastructure.
“Description and Location of Development: Construct 33 affordable dwellings and retail unit with appropriate green infrastructure, access, parking, and associated works - Land At Grid Ref 313987 195625 Winding Wheel Lane Penallta…”
“The proposed development comprises the construction of 33 affordable apartments contained within three building blocks, along with a 4000sqft retail unit, located on the easternmost section of the site. The scheme also includes a new internal road, turning head, designated car parking areas, and amenity areas.”
Officer report
The site and its surroundings
The 1.1-hectare brownfield site slopes eastwards and lies near listed former Penallta Colliery buildings, including the Colliery Baths Building.
“Site description: Land to the north-east of Penallta Road and to the west of Winding Wheel Lane. The land slopes down broadly from west to east. To the north-west of the site are Listed Buildings formerly part of the Penallta Colliery site most notably including the large grade 2* Colliery Baths Building.”
Officer report
Planning history
One earlier application since 2010 concerned a directional sign and was granted in 2021.
“PLANNING HISTORY 2010 TO PRESENT 21/0065/ADV - Erect a directional sign to prevent access onto Cwm Calon housing estate for hauliers whose destination is IG Design Group in Penallta Industrial Estate - Granted 27.05.2021.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended deferral for a Section 106 agreement securing 25% affordable housing, followed by permission with conditions.
“25% of the residential units provided as affordable housing.”
“On completion of the Section 106 Obligation (B) planning permission is granted subject to the following conditions.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered the brownfield mixed-use scheme acceptable for housing, retail, heritage, amenity, highways, ecology and landscaping reasons.
“The site is identified under policy CM4.6 (Principal Town and Local Centre Development Sites) for retail/office. The Planning Policy Officer has considered the proposal and considers that the retail element fulfils this policy requirement and residential development would be justified given the shortfall of housing being provided against the housing trajectory.”
“The Housing Strategy Officer has confirmed that the policy requirement (Policy CW11) would be for 25 percent of housing on the site to be affordable housing. The applicant has indicated that it is likely the scheme would be developed with 100 percent affordable housing. It is considered that the required contribution of 25 percent affordable housing is secured via a legal agreement to accord with Policy CW11.”
Officer report
What consultees and residents said
Consultees raised no objections subject to conditions, while residents supported a shop or objected to parking, boundaries, drainage and the retail unit.
“Transportation Engineering Manager - CCBC - No objections subject to detailed planning conditions to address highway considerations. Request informative advice be given to the applicant.”
“- Retail unit being built without a clear uptake of lease with concern that it would be built and then remain empty becoming subject to vandalism and an unsightly blot on a very nice estate. Highlights existing supermarkets within driving distance although suggests the estate could do with a small local shop for convenience. - Level of parking provision.”
Officer report
What members decided
Members moved and seconded approval subject to amendments to three conditions and six additional conditions.
“Following consideration of the application it was moved and seconded that, subject to an amendment to conditions (1), (4) and (5), additional conditions (25), (26), (27), (28), (29) and (30) and the conditions contained in the Officer’s report, the recommendation be approved. By way of Microsoft Forms (and in noting there were 12 For, 0 Against and 0 Abstentions) this was unanimously agreed.”
“On completion of the Section 106 Obligation (B) planning permission be GRANTED subject to amended conditions (1), (4) and (5), additional conditions (25), (26), (27), (28), (29) and (30) and the conditions contained in the Officer’s report.”
Minutes
The final decision
The application was deferred for the Section 106 agreement and then granted subject to amended, additional and reported conditions.
“(i) (A) the application be DEFERRED to allow the applicant to enter into a Section 106 Obligation for the following:”
Minutes
Sources
- Caerphilly Planning Committee minutes, 11 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Caerphilly's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Caerphilly Planning Committee
- Council
- Caerphilly
- Date
- Wednesday 11 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Deferred
- Vote
- 12 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Caerphilly committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.