28 small business units at Plot 3 Ty Du Business Park, Nelson
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Caerphilly Planning Committee on 11 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought full permission for 28 small business units in B1 or B8 use, with access, parking, cycle parking, refuse storage and landscaping.
“Description and Location of Development: Erect 28 small business units with associated access, parking and landscaping - Plot 3 Ty Du Business Park Nelson…”
“Ancillary development, e.g. parking: Vehicle parking, cycle parking and refuse storage areas are proposed for the units.”
Officer report
The site
The vacant 1.4-hectare greenfield site has two existing access points, lies south of Whitebeam Court and is allocated for employment purposes.
“Location: The site is part of the Ty Du Local Development Plan allocation and is immediately to the south of the existing Business Units at Whitebeam Court.”
“Site description: The site is currently vacant greenfield land with two access points already created. The site is approximately 1.4 ha in size.”
Officer report
Earlier permissions
Earlier permissions covered mixed-use development, infrastructure, contamination and landscaping, and reserved matters for commercial buildings and employment units.
“18/0175/COND - Discharge condition 21 (Landscaping scheme) of planning consent 16/0373/OUT (Provide a mixed use development comprising residential development of up to 200 dwellings, including the development of approximately 50 affordable homes, and the development of 3.8ha (approximately 6,300sqm) of B1 employment units, plus associated access, diversion of haul route, car parking, diversion of public rights of way, drainage, public open space, landscaping and associated…”
“20/0129/COND-Discharge condition 14 (Verification of contamination scheme) of planning consent 16/0373/OUT (Provide a mixed use development comprising residential development of up to 200 dwellings, including the development of approximately 50 affordable homes, and the development of 3.8ha (approximately 6,300sqm) of B1 employment units, plus associated access, diversion of haul route, car parking, diversion of public rights of way, drainage, public open space, landscaping…”
Officer report
The main planning issue
Employment use was established, but B8 use departed from the plan; officers considered mixed B1 and B8 use acceptable and restricted uses accordingly.
“Principle of Development: The site is allocated as part of a Business Park in the Local Development Plan and as such Policy CW13 (Use Class Restrictions - Business and Industry only allows for B1 uses and the provision of ancillary facilities or services to the primary employment use. The previous outline planning permission granted for employment uses on the site (ref. 16/0373/OUT) was restricted to B1 uses only in line with this allocation.”
“It is acknowledged that due to the site being divided into a number of smaller units, some flexibility for uses would be desirable. It is also considered that as the site is close to the strategic highway network, this would potentially be attractive to B8 uses. As such, it is considered that a mixed B1/B8 consent would be acceptable in principle.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered the design, highways, trees, landscaping, ecology, noise and flood risk acceptable, subject to conditions and advisory notes.
“Design: A Design and Access Statement has been submitted with the application. The proposed design and layout of the site is considered to be acceptable. The proposed small units are in scale with other development constructed/ proposed for the wider Ty Du site.”
“Transport/Highways: A Transport Statement has been submitted with this application. This concludes that the development will not have a significant impact on the transport network. A Travel Plan has also been submitted. It is noted that the Transportation Engineering Manager has not objected and conditions have been recommended to reflect these comments.”
Officer report
What consultees said
The transport authority had no objection subject to conditions, while consultees requested further details or conditions covering drainage, trees, waste, biodiversity and construction effects.
“Transportation Engineering Manager - CCBC - No objection subject to conditions.”
“Senior Arboricultural Officer (Trees) - Holding objection raised - further information is needed regarding tree retention/protection.”
Officer report
Public responses
The application was advertised through site notices, a press notice and letters to neighbouring businesses, but no responses were received.
“Extent of advertisement: The application was advertised by means of site notices, a press notice and letters to neighbouring businesses.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Members moved and seconded approval subject to the conditions, and unanimously agreed with 12 votes for, none against and no abstentions.
“The Planning Case Officer presented the application, with it confirmed in the accompanying report that the recommendation in respect of the proposal had taken full account of, and was in conformity with, both Future Wales and Planning Policy Wales Edition 12.”
“Following consideration of the application it was moved and seconded that, subject to the conditions contained in the Officer’s report, the recommendation be approved. By way of Microsoft Forms (and in noting there were 12 For, 0 Against and 0 Abstentions) this was unanimously agreed.”
Minutes
Sources
- Caerphilly Planning Committee minutes, 11 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Caerphilly's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Caerphilly Planning Committee
- Council
- Caerphilly
- Date
- Wednesday 11 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 12 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Caerphilly committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.