550-home mixed-use redevelopment at Broadwalk Shopping Centre, Bristol

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bristol Planning Committee A on 22 Apr 2026.

25/15200/XApproved

The site today

The site contains the largely redundant shopping centre, offices, library, car parks, former petrol station and former library buildings beside Redcatch Park.

“13-Apr-26 OFFICIAL 2.2 The land is currently in a mix of uses but is predominantly in use as the Broadwalk Shopping Centre; a retail centre with over 30 shops, leisure and entertainment uses and food outlets. Offices and a public library are located the southeastern extent of the site, at the corner of Broad Walk with Wells Road. A multi-storey car park is located in the western part of the site and car parking is also provided at roof level above the Shopping Centre.”

“The main pedestrian entrance to the Shopping Centre is at the corner of Broad Walk with Wells Road. The site is designated within the Knowle Local Centre and as a Primary Shopping Area in the Council's Site Allocations and Development Management Policies (July 2014). Redcatch Park is designated as Important Open Space.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Six objections, 32 supporting letters and two neutral comments were received, while local groups differed over density, parking, commercial space and housing design.

“The application was advertised by the erection of a site notice, and advert in a local newspaper, and by writing to 357 neighbouring properties. As a result six objections have been received from local residents, 32 letters of support and two neutral comments.”

“The protection of nature and improvements to the natural environment should be central to the design of the development (see section 16). • The height of the proposed development would be visually overwhelming (see section 13). • The Silver Birch currently growing by the old library should be saved and planted elsewhere – OFFICER COMMENT: No objections have been raised by the Council’s arboriculturalist, and any tree lost will be mitigated at the reserved matter stage).”

Officer report

Support for the changes

Supporters welcomed the reduced scale, lower impact on Redcatch Park, townhouses and the proposed local services and flexible community space.

“The reduction in scale and density across the site, from approximately 850 residential units to fewer than 550 - is a significant and welcome improvement. In particular, we wholeheartedly support the substantial changes to the park boundary. The previous scheme proposed three tall storey residential blocks built up to, and effectively overshadowing, Redcatch Park. This caused widespread concern among park users and our committee.”

“13-Apr-26 OFFICIAL However, we also acknowledge that the retail market has changed exponentially and no longer supports shopping centres of the scale and type that Broadwalk once represented, particularly as one of the first centres of its kind.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members welcomed collaboration and community engagement, supported housing delivery, and considered the reduced scheme sensitive and appropriately scaled.

“An update report confirmed that no objection had been received from the Environment Agency. • The scheme included 9.8% affordable housing. In response to members’ questions on the application, officers made the following comments/clarifications: • It was confirmed that although the revised scheme would deliver fewer overall dwellings, the 9.8% affordable housing offer had been independently viability tested and agreed as reasonable.”

“Members noted the evolution of the scheme since outline permission, welcomed the strong consensus between the community, councillors, and developer, and highlighted the need for certainty and investment for local businesses. • Members described the proposal as an exemplary scheme, welcoming the strong collaboration between stakeholders. Early engagement and responsiveness to local needs were highlighted as positive features.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

“Early engagement and responsiveness to local needs were highlighted as positive features. • Members noted that while the quantum of 550 dwellings was significant, the revised scheme was considered sensitive and appropriately scaled, reflecting effective scrutiny of the original proposal.”

Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Bristol Planning Committee A minutes, 22 April 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bristol's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Bristol
Date
Wednesday 22 April 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

17 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →