Estate footpaths and crossings at Various Roads Including Greenway, Hutton, Brentwood

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Brentwood Planning Committee on 30 Jun 2026.

25/01435/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed footpaths, crossings, roundels, rumble strips, dropped kerbs, cropped setts, widened paths and road layout changes.

“Planning permission is sought for footpaths across roads incl. Mount Avenue, Herington Grove, Greenway, Roundwood Avenue, Willow Close, Hillwood Close, Hillwood Grove, Spurgate, Heronway, Luppitt Close, and Bowhay to include roundels to be installed around estate, proposed rumble strips, dropped kerbs and cropped setts, including some existing footpaths to be widened and proposed road layout changes to Roundwood Avenue & Brockley Grove.”

“The application has been referred to planning committee by Cllr Quirk for the reasons that the application has not been consulted with many households on Hutton Mount, the correct Ward Cllrs were not included on the original neighbour letters, and the level of objection received.”

Officer report

The site and its character

The estate has large detached homes, spacious plots, mature trees and hedges, grass verges, limited footpaths and a low-density green character.

“The Hutton Mount Estate located within Shenfield is mainly occupied by large, detached properties set within spacious plots. The character of the area provides a low density verdant aesthetic which is enhanced by its well landscaped boundaries with established trees and hedges and limits to on-street parking.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

An earlier footpath application was permitted, while a proposed-use certificate application for three roads was found not lawful.

“23/01184/FUL: Construction of Footpaths along 3 roads (Heronway, Spurgate and Roundwood Avenue). – Application Permitted • 23/00488/S192: Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for a proposed use or development for the construction of Footpaths a long 3 roads (Heronway, Spurgate and Roundwood Avenue). – Not Lawful…”

Officer report

The officer assessment

Officers found limited visual harm but considered that pedestrian safety, reduced vehicle conflict and improved connectivity outweighed it.

“It is acknowledged that the development would result in some harm to the character and appearance of the area through the introduction of more urban features and the partial loss of grass verges. This harm has been given due weight in the assessment.”

“Weight is afforded to the clear public benefits of the proposal, particularly in terms of improving pedestrian safety, reducing conflict between vehicles and pedestrians, and enhancing walkability and connectivity within the estate. The existing situation, whereby pedestrians are frequently required to walk within the carriageway, represents an unsatisfactory and potentially unsafe environment. The proposal provides a proportionate and justified response to this issue.”

Officer report

Highway and drainage advice

The Highway Authority considered the proposal acceptable, while advising arrangements for highway works and separate surface-water drainage.

“Highway Authority: The information that was submitted in association with the application has been fully considered by the Highway Authority.”

“From a highway and transportation perspective the impact of the proposal is acceptable to the Highway Authority subject to the following condition:”

Officer report

Views from residents

Six objections raised speeding, grass and hedge loss, trees, drainage, parking, path width and the appearance of roundels; two responses supported the works.

“Moving the signage and gate to a new position would imply additional houses are part of the Hutton Mount Estate. • The20mph roundels will not deter speeding motorists; it needs a physical deterrent like speed humps. • There are existing paths, albeit relatively narrow, and there does not appear to be a pressing need for adding significant extra width to the path. The paths are used at certain times of the day and one way traffic.”

“The proposed path and loss of greenery will further urbanise the location. • The existing grass also serves to absorb some water from the road. Replacing this with tarmac will likely result in more water flowing onto the lawn behind the hedge. • The path will also likely encourage its use for parking of contractors' vehicles during the proposed re-building of the property on the other side of the road, no doubt damaging the new surface.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Members unanimously voted to approve the application, with eleven votes for, no votes against and no abstentions.

“A motion was MOVED UNANIMOUSLY by Cllr Mynott to APPROVE the application. This was SECONDED by Cllr McCheyne.”

“FOR: Cllrs Mynott, M Cuthbert, Bakhsh, Baldock, [name withheld], Gorton, McCheyne, Parker, Patel, Rigby, Thomson (11) AGAINST: (0) ABSTAIN: (0)”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved subject to revised plans being submitted before determination to address the objector’s concerns.

“The motion was moved to approve subject to revised drawings being sought prior to determination of the application to address [name withheld] objections.”

“The application was APPROVED subject to revised plans being submitted before the determination of the application.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Brentwood Planning Committee minutes, 30 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Brentwood's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Brentwood
Date
Tuesday 30 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

18 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →