School sports pitches at Kingsbury High School, London NW9
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Brent Planning Committee on 2 Jul 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed two artificial sports pitches for football and hockey, with fencing, floodlights, acoustic fencing and a relocated cricket facility.
“PROPOSAL IN DETAIL The development seeks the addition of a multi-use games area facility comprising two artificial sports pitches. The pitch to the west has been marked on the plans for football and the pitch on the east has been on the plans for hockey. The two artificial sport pitches combined will occupy a 126m x 102.5m section of the schools playing field on the southern side of the school site.”
“The size of the hockey pitch was reduced and pushed further to the northwest away from the boundary. • Lighting controls. • Acoustic fencing was added. • An area of biodiversity grassland was added. • Additionally, following comments from the local gas operator, the ball stop netting location was moved further away from the site boundary as not to fall over safeguarded land.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The school playing field is protected open space beside Roe Green Park, heritage assets, ecological areas, residential properties and a protected pipeline.
“Parts of the park are also designated as Grade 2 Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SNIC). The wider school site and playing field is close to the Roe Green Village Conservation Area, bounded to the east by Bacon Lane. To the west of the application site are residential properties on Grosvenor Crescent and Manor Close. SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES The key planning issues for Members to consider are set out below.”
Officer report
Planning history
There was no relevant planning history for the site.
“However, due to the nature of the development it is acknowledged that there is only a limited risk associated with fire safety. RELEVANT SITE HISTORY No relevant planning history CONSULTATIONS 89 nearby properties, including Friends of Eton Grove Park and the Roe Green Village Residents Association were notified by letter of this proposal for a minimum of 21 days on 28/03/2025.”
Officer report
Why officers recommended approval
Officers considered that the sporting, educational and community benefits outweighed limited effects on heritage, ecology, neighbours and protected open space.
“The use of lightweight and permeable materials, together with appropriate colours, ensures that the structures would not appear unduly visually intrusive or undermine the open character of the wider site, playing fields or surrounding open space. Subject to the detailed lighting and design conditions recommended, the development is considered to comply with Local Plan policies and the principles of Brent’s Design Guide SPD1. 149.”
“The scheme also achieves a substantial biodiversity net gain of +39.66%, exceeding the statutory minimum of 10%, and a Biodiversity Gain Plan will be secured through the statutory BNG condition to ensure long term habitat delivery and management. Transport impacts have been assessed, with the existing 83 space car park identified as more than sufficient to accommodate anticipated community use outside school hours.”
Officer report
Consultation and representations
Nine objections and 49 supporting letters were received, while consultees raised no objections subject to conditions or accepted the drainage proposals.
“Concerns relating to the origins of support comments. Any interested party who may be affected by a planning application is welcome to submit comments, objections or letters of support. Artificial pitches are linked to health conditions as a result of toxic chemicals on the surface of the pitch. The concerns raised regarding potential health effects associated with the materials used in artificial sports pitches are noted.”
“Beneficial for the students and wider community, where the existing field is unsuitable • Future proof hockey in the borough Internal Consultations Brent's Environmental Health and Noise Officers - No objection raised subject to conditions. External Consultation Sport England – No objection raised subject to conditions. Local Lead Flood Authority - No objection raised. The proposed measures are considered to be acceptable.”
Officer report
The vote and decision
The committee granted planning permission subject to the conditions and informatives, with seven votes in favour and one against.
“Having considered the application, the Committee RESOLVED to grant planning permission subject to:”
“(Voting on the above decision was as follows: 7 in favour of granting planning permission and 1 in favour of refusal).”
Minutes
Sources
- Brent Planning Committee minutes, 2 July 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Brent's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Brent Planning Committee
- Council
- Brent
- Date
- Thursday 2 July 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Brent committee decisions →
This committee's year
14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.