Seven replacement homes at 27-29 Moorhead Lane, Shipley

What was proposed

The application sought seven replacement dwellings, with access and landscaping works, after demolishing two existing homes.

“Type of Application/Proposal and Address: An application for full planning permission for the demolition of two dwellings and construction of seven replacement dwellings with access and landscaping works at 27-29 Moorhead Lane, Shipley.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site contains two substantial detached stone homes in generous grounds within an established residential area near Saltaire Village.

“Site Description: Nos 27 and 29 Moorhead Lane are two substantial detached dwellings which are constructed in natural stone with a red rosemary tiled roof, dating from the early C20 and set in generous grounds. They form part of a row of 3 No similar properties, including No 31 to the south, which sit on the western side of the highway, a short distance away from Saltaire Village, which sits to the north.”

“The surrounding area is residential in nature characterised by a mix of housing styles and ages with variations in plot sizes. Immediately to the north of the site is a complex of apartments known as 1 to 24 Petersgarth, a 3 No storey flat roofed, brick-built development dating from the mid C20. The mature trees along this boundary are subject to a Tree Preservation Order (TPO 0909).”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The town council raised energy and biodiversity concerns, while consultees found the revised scheme acceptable subject to conditions.

“Parish Council: Shipley Town Council – Notes that there is little in the submission to address energy conservation and efficiency. Would like to see the application of the Future Homes Standard. Concerns raised over the implications of the redevelopment of the site on biodiversity and ecology.”

“Consultations: Biodiversity – Initially the proposal was lacking in detail. However, further reports have been submitted, including a reconsidered Preliminary Ecological Assessment, Bat Survey and revised Biodiversity Net Gain Report. There is confidence that the site would not provide a supporting habitat for protected species. There are no bat roosts present in the building.”

Officer report

Objections and support

Forty people objected, two supported the scheme and one made a neutral comment, with concerns focused on scale, character, traffic, parking and neighbour amenity.

“A total of 43 No representations have been received. No have objected to the proposal, two support the scheme and an additional neutral comment has been received. A Shipley…”

“Summary of Representations Received: In Objection:- The scale and density of the proposed development is out of keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The existing buildings are attractive and their loss would significantly erode the architectural continuity and heritage of the street. The proposed design and materials, especially the use of render, would not be appropriate in the context of local character.”

Officer report

Who spoke

A Ward Councillor requested panel consideration while objecting, and an objector attended the meeting and made a representation.

Members’ discussion

Members questioned congestion and parking, heard that amendments addressed concerns, and one member described the scheme as an excellent use of land.

“A concern was raised regarding the highway layout to avoid further congestion to that already occurring. Officers advised that 2 spaces were required per dwelling and the proposal included 2 per unit and a double garage. There would also be 2 shared visitor parking spaces. Amendments had been made to address local concerns in response to objections raised.”

“A member commented that it was an excellent use of land and could not see any reasons to refuse.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee approved the application subject to the conditions in the technical report.

“That the application be approved subject to the conditions set out in the Strategic Director, Growth’s technical report.”

Minutes