Garden annexe accommodation at 79 Church Road, Bexleyheath
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Bexley Planning Committee on 4 Sept 2025.
What was proposed
A detached single-storey rear-garden outbuilding would provide one-bedroom annexe accommodation for a family member as ancillary space to the house.
“The proposal is for a single storey detached outbuilding in the rear garden.”
“The proposed outbuilding would be 2.5m tall, 7m deep and 5.67m wide. The proposed outbuilding would be 8m set forward from the rear boundary line of the 79 Church Road. The proposed outbuilding would form annexe accommodation and would contain one bedroom, a bathroom, a kitchen/ diner and a pantry room. The applicant has confirmed that the annexe is to be used by a family member as an ancillary space to the main dwellinghouse. CONSULTATIONS”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The semi-detached property is near the centre of Church Road and is outside conservation areas and listed-building designations.
“The application site is located towards the centre of Church Road, at the junction with Belvedere Road. To the Northeast of Church Road, there is Upland Road, which forms an offshoot from Belvedere Road. The application site is a semi-detached property of a different form and design to the neighbouring context.”
“The proposal site is not located within a conservation area, nor is it a statutorily or locally listed building or in close proximity to a building listed as such.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
A roof-space certificate was granted, while a previous application to convert the property into an HMO was refused over transport and waste information.
“24/02187/LDCP Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed) for the conversion of roof space involving alterations to existing roofline, including a hip to gable enlargement, a rear dormer extension and three rooflights to front roofslope. GRANTED.”
“The proposal fails to demonstrate that it would not have an adverse impact on parking provision, highway safety, cycle accessibility, and waste management due to the lack of necessary supporting information, including a parking stress survey, accurate plans, and a comprehensive waste management strategy.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The Tree Officer had no objection, subject to following protection methods because only a small part of the tree’s root zone would be affected.
“The building is only within small percentage of the Trees Roots Zone, and the protection methods (if followed) should minimise further harm. Therefore, I have no objection on the grounds of the tree to this application.”
Officer report
Objections and support
Four neighbours objected over possible HMO use, overcrowding, noise, tree harm, privacy, security, access and property value; a consultancy supported multigenerational living.
“- Potential use as an HMO - Overcrowding - Increased noise pollution - Potential harm to mature tree - Fear that the outbuilding will be used for non-ancillary purposes - Potential separate access from side of 79 Church Road - Loss of privacy and security - De-value property - Questions the use of the outbuilding for a family member given the recent HMO application A representation in support has been received from the National Annexe Planning Consultancy (NAPC):”
“- Commend applicant for finding an innovative solution for multigenerational living - Encourage consideration to the scale of the development and effective access to ensure ancillary nature RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY”
Officer report
Committee discussion
The committee discussed the application and noted the report together with its addendum.
“25/00940/FUL - 79 CHURCH ROAD, BEXLEYHEATH, DA7 4DL (Agenda Item No. 5e)”
“This Committee discussed the application and noted the report with the Addendum item for this application.”
Minutes
The vote
Members voted 11 to 0 to approve the application in accordance with the recommendation.
“Following their discussion, the Committee RESOLVED on a vote of 11/0 to approve the application in accordance with the recommendation as set out in the report before them.”
Minutes
The decision
Planning permission was approved subject to conditions, including ancillary use, privacy protection and tree-protection measures.
“Reason: To protect the amenities and privacy of the adjoining properties. Notwithstanding the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any Order revoking, re-enacting or modifying that Order), the outbuilding hereby approved shall only be used for purposes ancillary to the residential use of the dwellinghouse known as 79 Church Road and shall not be occupied as any form of separate or self- contained residential accommodation…”
“The development hereby approved shall be undertaken in accordance with the Tree Protection Measures set out in submitted Tree Protection Scheme (produced by Green Code Architects Ltd, ref. GCA294FL, dated 15.07.2025) Reason: In order to minimise the impact on existing trees and in the interests of good arboricultural practice.”
Officer report
Sources
- Bexley Planning Committee minutes, 4 September 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Bexley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Bexley Planning Committee
- Council
- Bexley
- Date
- Thursday 4 September 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 11 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Bexley committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
20 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.