Six bin storage units at Tramway House, Stonewood Road, Erith

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bexley Planning Committee on 29 Jan 2026.

25/00162/FULRefusedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application proposed six bin storage units in the communal car park, arranged in two rows of three.

“This application seeks planning permission for the installation of six bin storage units within the communal car park. The bin stores would be MetroSTOR PBM 3 and be aligned in two rows of three. The dimensions measure approximately 1.84m in height, 4.55m in width and 1.39m in depth for each individual row (3 stores).”

Officer report

The site and its setting

Tramway House is a six-storey block beside Stonewood Road, Walnut Tree Road and West Street, and is not listed or in a conservation area.

“Tramway House relates to a six-storey block located to the northern side of Stonewood Road and on the western side of the junction between Walnut Tree Road and West Street, with access taken from Stonewood Road. Stonewood Road, Walnut Tree Road, and West Street are unclassified Local Access Roads.”

“The property is not locally listed, statutorily listed, or within a conservation area.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

Permission was granted in 2004 for a six-storey block containing 23 flats with associated parking.

“Concern regarding loss of parking spaces. ➢ Concern regarding rat infestation ➢ Concern regarding health risks RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY”

“03/03516/FUL: Erection of a six storey block comprising 23 residential flats with associated parking. Granted on 21/01/2004.”

Officer report

Officers recommended approval

Officers considered the proposal acceptable because it would not significantly harm the area, neighbours, parking or highway safety.

“The key issues to consider include the impact of the development on the character and appearance of the area; the impact on the occupiers of neighbouring properties and the impact on parking and the highway.”

“For the reasons set out in the report, the proposed development is considered to be acceptable and would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the street scene or the wider area. The proposal is considered to result in no significant harm to the amenities of neighbouring properties and is not anticipated to result in adverse issues with parking or highway safety.”

Officer report

Parking and design assessment

The proposal would remove two spaces currently used for refuse bins, while officers considered the stores functional and not dominating the street scene.

“Whilst the proposal would result in the loss of two vehicle parking spaces, the Local Highways Authority has reviewed the proposal and considers that the loss would not be detrimental and the spaces have not been utilised for parking for a significant period. The proposal has been revised to 6 bins storage containers within the two car parking spaces. No additional car parking spaces are lost due to the amended drawings.”

“The proposed bins stores would measure 1.8m in height and 1.3m in depth with one row of four units measuring 4.5m in width and a single unit measuring 1.5m in width. The bins would allow front loaded touch free deposits and have all-steel construction finished in Pre-Coated Steel in Firenze Anthracite Grey.”

Officer report

The committee’s concerns

The committee was concerned that the proposal could affect neighbouring flat occupants through odour and look unsightly near the entrance and from the footpath.

“Following their discussion, the Committee moved and seconded the recommendation as set out in the report, but this was not supported on a vote of 5/4. Following further discussion, a motion contrary to the recommendation before the Committee, namely that the application be refused, was moved and seconded, and the Committee RESOLVED to refuse the application on a vote of 5/3.”

“The key reasons given for refusing the proposal was its impact on the amenity of the neighbouring occupants of the flats there, due to potential odour issues, and be unsightly, due to its siting near the main entrance of the building, and when viewed from the footpath.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “The committee’s concerns”.

Sources

  • Bexley Planning Committee minutes, 29 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bexley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Bexley
Date
Thursday 29 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Vote
5 for refusal, 3 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

41 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →