Detached two-storey dwelling at 129 Raeburn Road, Sidcup

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bexley Planning Committee on 22 May 2025.

24/02175/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed a detached two-storey dwelling with front parking and refuse storage, plus alterations including removing side windows from the existing house.

“SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: Erection of a detached two storey dwelling with refuse storage and parking to the front. Alterations to existing house including removal of windows to side fenestration.”

“Erection of a detached two storey dwelling with refuse storage and parking to the front. Alterations to existing house including removal of windows to side fenestration.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a two-storey detached house on Raeburn Road, where properties are generally two storeys and most have off-street parking.

“Raeburn Road is a two-storey detached dwellinghouse located on the western side of Raeburn Road. Generally, the street scene consists of properties both detached and semi-detached properties which are two storey in nature, some of which have been altered through extension. Whilst on street parking is available the majority of properties, including the application site, have off street parking.”

Officer report

Earlier planning permission

An earlier permission allowed an attached two-storey dwelling with front parking and refuse storage, while the new proposal would be detached and include design changes.

“22/02889/FUL: Erection of an attached two storey dwelling with refuse storage and parking to the front. Granted on 18/01/2023.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended permission because the proposal was acceptable in principle, would not harm area character or neighbours, and would not adversely affect parking.

“SUMMARY The key issues are the background to the development, the principle of development design, quality of residential accommodation, neighbouring amenity, highways, refuse and recycling, drainage, biodiversity net gain, sustainability, fire safety and other matters.”

“REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION The proposed development is considered to be acceptable in principle. The works proposed would not have a detrimental impact on the character of the area and would not harm the amenities of the neighbouring residential properties. The proposal would not have an adverse impact on parking.”

Officer report

Design and living conditions

The proposed dwelling would provide two bedrooms, 70 square metres of internal space, a 47-square-metre garden and acceptable effects on nearby homes.

“Policy DP11 of the Local Plan sets out that new dwellings should provide sufficient useable on-site external amenity space (communal, semi-private and private) and appropriate play spaces for children, relative to the proposed scale of development. Additionally, appropriate internal accommodation standards should be achieved. Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) provides space standards for proposed new residential units.”

“The proposed dwellinghouse would be located to the south of nos. 34-38 Blackfen Road and would have a separation distance of between 13 (no.36) and 15.5 metres (no.38). With regard to no. Blackfen Road the proposed gap between the flank wall of the proposed dwellinghouse and the rear elevation of no. Blackfen Road would be approx.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The Highway Authority, Environmental Health and Contaminated Land raised no objections, subject to highway and other planning conditions.

“Full consultations responses are provided in Appendix A. A brief summary of the responses is provided below.”

“The proposed dwelling would have 2 off-street car parking spaces and the host dwelling would have 1 off-street car parking space. The proposals are unlikely to have any significant negative impact on the surrounding highway network and subsequently the Highway Authority has raised no objections subject to the imposition of conditions relating to reserving the parking spaces for such use, detail of their layout, surfacing and drainage, pedestrian visibility splays,…”

Officer report

Objections received

Three objections raised concerns about an overbearing impact, outlook, drainage and increased pressure for parking.

“Overbearing impact; ➢ Impact on outlook; ➢ Impact on drainage; ➢ Increase on parking pressures.”

Officer report

The committee vote

The committee voted 10 to 0 to approve the application in accordance with the recommendation.

“24/02175/FUL - 129 RAEBURN ROAD, SIDCUP, KENT, DA15 8RE (Agenda Item No. 5c)”

“Following their discussion, the Committee RESOLVED on a vote of 10/0 to approve the application in accordance with the recommendation as set out in the report before them.”

Minutes

The decision and conditions

Planning permission was granted subject to conditions covering approved plans, drainage, parking, cycles, landscaping, biodiversity, sustainability, privacy and refuse storage.

“The use of the land for vehicle parking shall not be commenced until the area has been laid out, surfaced, and drained in accordance with details first submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority and shall be permanently maintained thereafter.”

“Details of arrangements for cycle storage for two cycles (including means of enclosure for the area concerned where necessary) shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority before any part of the development hereby permitted is commenced and the approved arrangements shall be completed before any part of the development is first occupied, and permanently maintained thereafter.”

Officer report

Sources

  • Bexley Planning Committee minutes, 22 May 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bexley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Bexley
Date
Thursday 22 May 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
10 for, 0 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

5 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →