Single-storey rear extension at 6 Ripon Road, Bournemouth
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Bcp Eastern BCP Planning Committee on 18 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought permission to demolish the garage and rear lean-to and build a single-storey rear extension.
“This application seeks planning permission for the demolition of an existing garage and rear single storey lean-to extension and for the construction of a single storey rear extension.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is a two-storey detached house in a residential area, with an attached garage, short driveway and low boundary wall.
“Ripon Road is located in a residential area which largely comprises of two storey detached dwellings with a variety of materials such as red brick, render and cladding. Most dwellings tend to have modest frontages and rely on on-street car parking, with the exception of a small number of dwellings situated close to the adjacent Green Road. These have either a side garage or parking to the front of the property.”
“There is an attached garage to the east of the dwelling and a short driveway in front of the garage. A low red brick boundary wall separates the site from its neighbours to the side and the pavement to the front.”
Officer report
The officer assessment
The extension was considered modest, subservient and acceptable in design, with no significant harm to neighbours, parking or highways.
“The proposed rear extension would be the width of the existing dwelling, would measure 2.3m in length and would have a lean-to roof abutting the property below the first floor windows. It would be finished with smooth render. It would not be readily visible from public views along the street albeit removal of the garage would open up some views. Overall, it is considered to be an acceptable design and of modest size that would appear subservient to the host dwelling.”
“The proposal is considered to be acceptable with regards to issues of design and character and would comply with Policy CS41.”
Officer report
Consultation response
The Local Highways Authority raised no objections, and the proposal would provide space for the required two parking spaces.
“The site is in Zone D with 5+ Habitable Rooms, at least two car parking spaces are required as per ‘Table 10 C3: Houses’ of the Parking Standards SPD.”
“No plans have been submitted for existing or proposed parking, however, with the removal of the garage and rear lean-to and no replacement structure proposed, there would be sufficient space for the required two parking spaces along the side of the dwelling.”
Officer report
Public response
Site notices were displayed and no representations were received.
“Site notices were erected on 22 nd October 2025 with an expiry of 12 th November 2025. No representations have been received.”
Officer report
Speakers
No speakers were registered.
The committee decision
The committee granted permission in accordance with the officer recommendation, with the vote unanimous.
“RESOLVED to GRANT permission in accordance with the recommendation set out in the officer’s report…”
Minutes
Sources
- Bcp Eastern BCP Planning Committee minutes, 18 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Bcp's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Bcp Eastern BCP Planning Committee
- Council
- Bcp
- Date
- Thursday 18 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Bcp committee decisions →
This committee's year
8 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.