Two flats to one home at 17 Foxcombe Road, Newbridge, Bath

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bath Planning Committee on 15 Apr 2026.

25/04761/FULApprovedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application sought to change two residential flats into one four-bedroom dwelling, with internal works only and no change to the outside.

“REPORT The application refers to 17 Foxcombe Road, a Victorian terraced property in Newbridge comprised of two residential flats.”

“Planning permission is sought for the change of use from two flats to a single dwelling (C3).”

Officer report

Support from local people

Fourteen local residents supported the proposal, citing its family housing benefits, lower parking demand, reduced noise and fit with nearby homes.

“Identified shortage of family housing Evidence within the Council's own housing needs assessments indicates a significant shortage of 3-4 bedroom family housing in Bath. The proposal would directly contribute to addressing this imbalance, particularly in a sustainable inner-city location. Recent development patterns in the area have focused heavily on smaller flats, with limited provision for family accommodation.”

“Third Parties/Neighbours: 14no. comments in support of the application were received from local residents. Matters raised are summarised below: - Property was originally a single dwelling - Reduction in parking demand - In line with other renovations in the street from two flats to one house - In keeping with surrounding houses - Good facilities for families in the area - Reduces noise nuisance of kitchens and communal rooms next to bedrooms - There have been lots of recent…”

Officer report

Why officers advised refusal

Officers found the flats reasonably good accommodation and concluded that the proposal’s benefits were not substantial enough to justify losing one home.

“OFFICER ASSESSMENT The proposal is for the change of use of 2no 20bed flats flats to 1no. 4-bed single dwellinghouse. The property is a terraced property in Newbridge. It was originally a single dwelling before gaining planning permission for the subdivision into flats in 1989. The proposed works are internal only and the external appearance of the property would not change.”

“Demonstrable and substantial conservation benefits 2. Demonstrable and substantial economic, social, and environmental benefits…”

Officer report

Other planning effects

The proposal was considered acceptable for design, heritage, World Heritage Site, residential amenity, highway safety and parking matters.

“The proposed development is within the Bath World Heritage Site; therefore, consideration must be given to the effect the proposal might have on the outstanding universal value of the World Heritage Site. In this instance, due to the size, location, and appearance of the proposed development it is not considered that it will result in harm to the outstanding universal value of the World Heritage Site.”

“As set out above, the proposal would likely result in some improvements to residential amenity, although this is not considered to outweigh the loss of a residential unit.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The application was permitted, subject to a three-year time limit and compliance with the approved plans.

“1 Standard Time Limit (Compliance) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.”

“2 Plans List (Compliance) The development/works hereby permitted shall only be implemented in accordance with the plans as set out in the plans list.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The minutes do not record the members' reasons for departing from the officers' recommendation.

Sources

  • Bath Planning Committee minutes, 15 April 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bath's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Bath
Date
Wednesday 15 April 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Approved, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

43 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 9 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →