Seven-bedroom HMO at 12 Cameley Green, Twerton, Bath
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Bath Planning Committee on 15 Apr 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to change a three-bedroom dwelling into a seven-bedroom HMO, with a rear extension, alterations, bin store and bike store.
“The site is within a primarily residential area and falls within Bath World Heritage Site. The proposal is for a change of use of a 3 bedroom dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to a 7 bedroom House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) (Sui Generis) with single storey rear extension, associated external and internal alterations, bin store and bike store.”
Officer report
The site and its history
The site is in a primarily residential area within the Bath World Heritage Site, and there was no relevant planning history on the site.
“Relevant Planning History: There is no relevant planning history on this site.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the proposal met HMO, amenity, design, World Heritage Site and transport requirements.
“The proposed development is within the double-inscribed World Heritage Site that consists of the City of Bath and the Great Spa Towns of Europe UNESCO inscriptions. Therefore, consideration must be given to the impact proposals might have on their Outstanding Universal Value and associated attributes. In this instance, due to the nature and limited scale of the proposal, it will not result in harm to the Outstanding Universal Value of either World Heritage Site inscription.”
Officer report
Consultation and objections
The environmental protection team ultimately raised no objection subject to conditions, while the ward councillor and 42 neighbours objected to noise, light, parking and housing impacts.
“Harm to amenity of neighbours due to noise and disturbance. Overdevelopment of property. The rooms as proposed, are predominantly, only marginally larger than the minimum standards. Layout could result in significant noise and disturbance to the neighbouring property's amenity due to drainage and a lounge and bathroom being adjacent to bedrooms next door. There is a lack of adequate information concerning this potential noise impact.”
“2nd comment: No objection, subject to conditions. The submitted noise assessment demonstrates that, with the proposed construction upgrades, there will be at least an 8dB exceedance of the baseline Building Regulations criteria (Approved Document E). As this comfortably exceeds what would be considered a good level of sound insulation at +5dB in this context of a 7-bed HMO with BISF construction next to a dwelling, I have no objection to the proposal.”
Officer report
Noise and living conditions
Officers considered the acoustic assessment and proposed mitigation sufficient, with conditions requiring soundproofing and evidence before occupation.
“Without further evidence being provided and to enable Environmental Protection to properly assess the risk of noise impact, I would suggest that the applicant be required to submit a site-specific acoustic assessment by a qualified acoustician. This should address the construction type and suitable mitigation measures to minimise the risk of an adverse impact.”
Officer report
A similar local appeal
A similar HMO application at 30 Shaws Way had been refused by the committee but was later allowed on appeal after insulation was secured by condition.
“OTHER MATTERS Third parties have advised that the property is identical in construction and layout to number 30 Shaws Way (25/01744/FUL), within the same local area, for which committee refused planning permission for change of use from a 3-bedroom dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to a 6-bedroom House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) (Use Class C4) on the grounds of harm to amenity.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee permitted the application and imposed conditions covering noise mitigation, storage, energy efficiency, occupancy and the approved plans.
“Noise mitigation measures (pre-occupation) Prior to the occupation of the property as a large scale House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) (Sui Generis), evidence, including photographs, that the proposed soundproofing measures, detailed in section 3 of the below submitted document and shown on the approved drawing below, have been installed shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.”
“Plans List (Compliance) The development/works hereby permitted shall only be implemented in accordance with the plans as set out in the plans list.”
Minutes
Main conditions
Occupation requires soundproofing evidence, bicycle and refuse storage, and an EPC C certificate, while the HMO is restricted to seven occupants.
“Bicycle and Refuse/Recycling Storage (Pre-occupation)”
Minutes
Sources
- Bath Planning Committee minutes, 15 April 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Bath's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Bath Planning Committee
- Council
- Bath
- Date
- Wednesday 15 April 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Bath committee decisions →
This committee's year
43 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 9 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.