Seven-bedroom HMO at 26 Wedgwood Road, Whiteway, Bath

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bath Planning Committee on 18 Mar 2026.

25/04124/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application sought to change a single dwelling into a seven-bedroom house in multiple occupation.

“REPORT The application refers to the residential property 26 Wedgwood Road, Whiteway, BA2 1NX.”

“Planning permission is sought for the Change of use from single dwelling (C3) to 7 bedroom hmo.”

Officer report

The site

The application concerned the residential property at 26 Wedgwood Road, Whiteway, Bath, within an area covered by an Article 4 HMO direction.

“25/04124/FUL Site Location: 26 Wedgwood Road Whiteway Bath Bath And North East Somerset BA2 1NX”

Officer report

Planning history

There was no relevant planning history on the site.

“There is no relevant planning history on this site.”

Officer report

What people said

Seven objections raised concerns about HMO numbers, loss of a family home, overdevelopment, communal space, parking, infrastructure and the local school; one person supported reuse.

“I would like to object to this application for an HMO. I believe this does not pass the concentration test as we already have HMOs at numbers 3, 18, 20, 28, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36 Wedgwood, which I believe would all fall within the 100 m radius. If the planning officer is minded to approve this application, I would request it is referred to the planning committee.”

“- There is a large number of HMOs in this local area, - This results in the loss of a family home, whilst Councils and Government are saying there are already not enough, - Turing this into a 7-bedroom HMO is a massive overdevelopment of the site, - The communal area is tiny for 7 adults to live there, - The existing parking situation is appalling and the proposal will add further to this problem, - People parking directly on corners making it dangerous.”

Officer report

Members’ views

Members discussed the recalculated HMO density, whether ten percent was a limit or target, overdevelopment, design, resident amenity, and moving cycles and bins through the accommodation.

“Cllr Halsall acknowledged that the recalculation confirmed that there was less than 10% density of HMOs but commented that 10% was the maximum rather than a target. He stated that he favoured purpose-built student accommodation rather than family homes being converted to HMOs but that the application was policy compliant and he would support the officers’ recommendation.”

“Cllr Jackson stated that although she supported students living in the community and affordable alternatives to purpose built accommodation, she was concerned about the number of people who would be living in this development and the logistics of getting cycles and bins through the living accommodation.”

Minutes

The vote

A motion to support the officers’ recommendation was carried by six votes to three.

“Cllr Halsall moved the officers’ recommendation. This was seconded by Cllr Simon.”

“On voting for the motion, it was CARRIED (6 in favour and 3 against).”

Minutes

The decision

The application was permitted subject to the conditions set out in the report.

“RESOLVED that the application be permitted subject to the conditions set out in the report.”

Minutes

Conditions included

The permission required the development to begin within three years, follow the approved plans and provide bicycle storage before occupation.

“1 Standard Time Limit (Compliance) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.”

“3 Bicycle Storage (Pre-occupation) No occupation of the development shall commence until the bicycle storage has been provided in accordance with the details which have been approved by the Local Planning Authority. The storage shall be retained permanently thereafter.”

Officer report

Sources

  • Bath Planning Committee minutes, 18 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bath's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Bath
Date
Wednesday 18 March 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

32 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 8 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →