Fence and garden shed at 54 Uplands Road, Saltford

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bath Planning Committee on 22 Oct 2025.

25/01551/FULApproved

What was proposed

Retrospective permission was sought for a boundary fence and outbuilding in the front garden, with alterations proposed to the fencing.

“REPORT The application refers to 54 Uplands Road, a single storey dwelling, in Saltford. The property is located on a road with a range of dwelling styles and is not within a Conservation Area.”

“Planning permission is sought for the erection of a boundary fence and outbuilding in the front garden of the property. The application is retrospective, however some alterations to the fencing have been proposed through this planning application.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

Earlier permissions covered a front porch, a single-storey side extension and new dormers.

“08/00667/FUL PERMIT - Erection of a front porch.”

“07/01063/FUL PERMIT - Erection of a single storey side extension and new dormers.”

Officer report

Officers’ assessment

Officers considered the fence and screened shed acceptable in appearance, unlikely to harm neighbours and unlikely to significantly affect highway safety.

“The fencing provides adequate screening of the shed from views from Uplands Road, mitigating the visual impact of the shed on the local area. It is important that the development, including the shed and fence is considered as one, and officers intend to secure the retention of the fencing in perpetuity via condition, if the application is approved.”

“The comments from Saltford Parish Council in this regard are noted, however given the orientation of the plot and the small area of land that lies to the rear of the principal elevation of the dwelling, there are limited options in terms of siting a shed to have a lesser visual impact and even less areas where a shed could be considered permitted development. It is therefore reasonable that a shed would be sited in this location and this is not unduly harmful in the context.”

Officer report

Local council objections

The parish council objected that the fence and shed were out of character, reduced street openness, affected visibility and overdeveloped the site.

“The use of a tall fence, in this case using feather-edge fence boards, looks incongruous compared to neighbouring properties and reduces the openness of the street scene at this location. The fence's overbearing effect on the street scene might be mitigated if a more open, lattice style, fence or iron railings is used as in other parts of Saltford's housing area. In this particular case, the high fence also blocks the view for vehicles exiting the neighbouring property, No.”

“The new shed on this plot, where much of the front garden has been paved as a hard- standing for vehicles and the rear garden is very compact in size, appears to result in an over-development of the site.”

Officer report

Other representations

Neighbour notification took place for 21 days and no letters of representation were received.

“The application was publicised through the use of neighbour notification letters for a period of 21 days and no letters of representation were received.”

Officer report

Why it went to committee

The chair and vice chair referred the application to committee for discussion after the parish council’s objection and concerns about its character.

“Chair referral - Following the objection from the Parish Council, against the Officer's recommendation, the application was referred to the Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning Committee. The Chair and Vice Chair both reviewed the report and recommended that the application be reviewed and determined by the Planning Committee. Their comments are below:”

Officer report

Conditions on permission

The fence must receive trellis within six months and remain while the approved shed is in place, in accordance with the approved plans.

“Within 6 months of the date of this decision, the existing fencing shall be amended and the fence top trelis installed, in accordance with the approved plans.”

“The fencing hereby approved, shall be retained whilst the shed hereby approved is in situ. In the event that the shed is removed, then the fencing can also be removed.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Bath Planning Committee minutes, 22 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bath's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Bath
Date
Wednesday 22 October 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

15 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →