Solar farm at Parcel 1643, Middle Piece Lane, Keynsham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bath Planning Committee on 24 Sept 2025.

24/02489/EFULRefused

The site and its setting

The 28.2-hectare agricultural site lies in the Green Belt east of Burnett, with about 18 hectares proposed for solar panels.

“The site is formed of 4 fields, identified within this report as fields 1, 2, 3 and 4. Field 1 is the northern most field, then working clockwise around the site. The whole site measures approximately 28.2 hectares in total. The area of the site proposed to be covered by solar panels is approximately 18 hectares.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

An earlier application sought an environmental impact assessment screening opinion for a ground-mounted solar array and associated infrastructure.

“23/03653/SCREEN - Request for an EIA Screening Opinion in relation to a proposed ground mounted solar array and associated infrastructure.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the proposal would cause substantial Green Belt harm and significant landscape harm that renewable energy benefits could not outweigh.

“Harm to the Green Belt has been identified through the development causing encouragement, contrary to a fundamental aim of the Green Belt. The development is as such identified as inappropriate development and this is by nature harmful and afforded substantial weight. The openness of the area is a key characteristic of this part of the landscape.”

“In this instance, very special circumstances do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm caused to the Green Belt by way of inappropriate development and the significant harm to the landscape that would also be caused. When considering the significant harm to the Green Belt and the Landscape, weighed together this harm out outweigh the benefits arising from renewable energy development.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Several consultees raised no objection, while conservation and landscape officers identified heritage and significant landscape harm; the Environment Agency withdrew its objection subject to conditions.

“Environment Agency: Withdrawal of previous objection, subject to conditions…”

“Landscape: Objection Significant harm caused to the landscape setting Mitigation insufficient to protect landscape Assessment of alternatives insufficient…”

Officer report

The decision and reasons

The committee refused the application because it was inappropriate Green Belt development and would cause significant landscape and visual harm that could not be satisfactorily mitigated.

“Green Belt The proposed development represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt. Very special circumstances do not exist to clearly outweigh the harm caused by the inappropriate development, harm to openness and the other harms identified. The development is as such contrary to policy CP8 of the Bath and North East Somerset Core Strategy, GB1 of the Placemaking Plan, and part 13 of the NPPF.”

“Landscape The proposed development is considered to result in significant harm to the landscape and its setting due to the scale and location of development. It would fail to conserve or enhance local landscape character, landscape features and local distinctiveness. The application is as such contrary to policy NE2 and NE2a of the Bath and North East Somerset Placemaking Plan.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Bath Planning Committee minutes, 24 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bath's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Bath
Date
Wednesday 24 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →