Self-build dwelling at Mistral, Hackwood Lane, Cliddesden
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Basingstoke Development Control Committee on 25 Feb 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a four-bedroom detached self-build dwelling, with works to an existing access.
“The proposal is for a detached four-bedroom self-build single dwelling. The proposal site lies outside of any Settlement Policy Boundary and within the Countryside. However, the proposal is considered to accord with the relevant development plan policies regarding development in the countryside.”
“Planning permission is sought for the erection of the proposed four-bedroom detached self-build single dwelling. The dwelling would be located within the side garden belonging to Mistral dwellinghouse. The dwelling would be ‘T’ shaped with varying lengths of approximately 15.7m, 9.9m and 7.2m, a maximum width of approximately 14m and a maximum height of 7.4m. The proposed dwelling would set from the southeast boundary by 2m and the northwest boundary by 3.4m.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is part of Mistral’s side garden, within a small residential cluster at least one kilometre from Cliddesden centre, beside open agricultural fields.
“The application site forms part of the side garden land belonging to Mistral; a private residential dwelling. The site is located within a cluster of residential dwellings located southeast of Hackwood Lane and at least 1km from the centre of the parish of Cliddesden. Mistral and the associated garden which is the subject of this application is located at the southeastern edge of this small cluster of residential developments and accessed via a narrow gravel track.”
Officer report
Planning history
The recorded planning history is an earlier permission for alterations to provide a room in the roof at Mistral, granted in 1987.
“The planning history for the site is set out below:”
“Reference Description Decision BDB/21954 Alterations To Provide Room in Roof (Mistral) Granted 15.04.1987”
Officer report
What people said
One objection concerned the narrow plot, parking, consultation and construction arrangements; consultees and the parish council raised concerns but no overall objection.
“Group Comment Where in the report this is considered Cliddesden Parish Council “No objection in principle to the proposal which is for part of the curtilage of Mistral and so will be considered previously developed land. However, concern is raised regarding over-development of the site.”
Officer report
What members discussed
Members considered the proposal straightforward and supported the officer recommendation for approval.
“The Committee discussed the proposed application which they believed to be straightforward and therefore supported the officer recommendation for approval.”
“It was highlighted that the only reason it was before the Development Control Committee was at the request of the ward councillors in the possibility that the officer recommendation was to refuse the application.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The committee approved the application subject to the listed conditions and informatives.
“RESOLVED that: the application be APPROVED subject to the conditions and informatives listed below.”
Minutes
Conditions attached
The conditions covered approved plans, biodiversity, services, landscaping, water efficiency, parking, materials, tree protection and construction controls.
“No development, including any demolition works, soil moving, temporary access construction and/or widening, or storage of materials shall commence on site until a detailed services layout has been submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. All services shall be included including gas, electricity, foul and fresh water, drainage and telecommunications. If a particular service is not required, a statement shall be included to that effect.”
“Prior to occupation of the dwelling hereby approved, a Construction Statement detailing how the new dwelling shall meet a water efficiency standard of 110 litres or less per person per day shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority through a demonstration that this requirement for sustainable water use cannot be achieved on technical or viability grounds.”
Minutes
Sources
- Basingstoke Development Control Committee minutes, 25 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Basingstoke's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Basingstoke
- Date
- Wednesday 25 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Basingstoke committee decisions →
This committee's year
27 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.