Four self-contained flats at Raymond Court, Friern Barnet, London N10
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Barnet Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a mansard roof with dormers and rooflights, creating four self-contained flats with parking, access, amenity, refuse and cycle facilities.
“The proposal is for construction of a 'mansard roof extension with front and rear dormer windows and side rooflights to provide 4no. self-contained flats. Associated vehicular access, parking, amenity space, refuse and recycling and cycle storage.”
“The mansard roof will occupy the entire footprint of the building and the roof ridge height will match the height of the consented 2023 application. The roof by itself will measure 2.7m in height.”
Officer report
The site and its history
Raymond Court is a three-storey block of 12 flats on a prominent corner plot, with several earlier applications and decisions concerning roof accommodation.
“The application site comprises a 3-storey building containing 12no. flats within the building known as Raymond Court.”
“Reference: 21/6224/S73 Address: Raymond Court, Pembroke Road, London, N10 2HS Decision: Refused Decision Date: 31 May 2023 Description: Variation of condition 2 (Approved Plans) of planning permission 18/1266/FUL (APP/N5090/W/18/3203934), dated 09/04/2019 for `Extension and conversion of existing roof space to provide 2no self-contained flats. Associated refuse/recycling, cycle store.`.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval, considering the proposal acceptable in its effect on the site, locality, neighbours, future residents and highways.
“Having taken all material considerations into account, it is considered that the proposal will have an acceptable impact on the character and appearance of the application site and the general locality. The development is also not considered to have an adverse impact on the amenities of neighbouring and future occupiers and on highways grounds. This application is therefore recommended for Approval.”
Officer report
Design and living conditions
Officers considered the roof design compatible with the area, neighbours’ living conditions protected, and the flats large enough with adequate communal amenity space.
“It is noted that dormer windows are proposed to the front and rear roof slopes of the roof. These windows would introduce some additional views to neighbouring properties, however having regard to the grain of the area and the presence of existing residential windows with the same or similar outlook, it is not considered that the proposal would be detrimental to the privacy of the occupants of any neighbouring property.”
“No additional private outdoor amenity space is proposed to serve the 4 no additional flats, however they would have access to the rear communal amenity space, measuring approximately 375sqm. The proposed units will require a total amenity space of 20sqm. Considering that the existing building comprises of 12 x 1b units, in addition of the proposed 4x1b units. The total amenity space required will be 80sqm.”
Officer report
What consultees and residents said
Nineteen objections raised concerns about height, character, parking, privacy, noise, structural risks, refuse and other effects; consultees raised no concerns subject to conditions.
“-Several nearby developments are already adding to density and visual impact -Question whether the foundations of this 1930s block (possibly only 450-600mm?) would be sufficient to bear the weight of an additional storey -Structural & Ground Risks -The revised layout places kitchens and living rooms directly above existing bedrooms, and shower rooms above living areas, resulting in potential noise disturbance and risk of leaks -Leases state that the communal garden spaces…”
“Internal consultees: Highways Officers have raised no concerns to the 2no. parking spaces for the proposed 4 self-contained units Environmental health officers have raised no concerns, subject to conditions Ecology officer has raised no concerns…”
Officer report
What members discussed
The planning officer presented the report, and the committee had an opportunity to ask officers questions.
“The Planning Officer presented the report.”
“The Committee then had the opportunity to ask questions of the officers.”
Minutes
The vote and decision
The committee voted seven to approve, with no votes against or abstentions, and approved the application subject to conditions and delegated authority.
“The Chair moved to vote on the Officer’s recommendation to approve the application.”
“RESOLVED the application be APPROVED subject to conditions AND the Committee grants delegated authority to the Service Director – Planning and Building Control to make any minor alterations, additions or deletions to the recommended conditions/obligations or reasons for refusal as set out in this report and addendum provided this authority shall be exercised after consultation with the Chair (or in their absence the Vice-Chair) of the Committee (who may request that such…”
Minutes
Sources
- Barnet Planning Committee minutes, 9 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Barnet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Barnet Planning Committee
- Council
- Barnet
- Date
- Wednesday 9 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Barnet committee decisions →
This committee's year
39 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 6 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.