Marketing board at Stowmarket Innovation Gateway, Stowmarket

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk Mid Suffolk Planning Committee on 19 Nov 2025.

DC/25/04636Approved

The site and surroundings

The sign would stand beside Gateway Boulevard, north of the Stowmarket Innovation Gateway within the Gateway 14 business and logistics park.

“The sign would be located adjacent to the highway of Gateway Boulevard to the north of the Plot 3200 site hosting the Stowmarket Innovation Gateway.”

“Figure 1: Location of sign (Signage site plan) 2.3. This sign is in addition to the four other marketing signs adjacent to the highways of Gateway Boulevard and Gateway Drive (now named Starfinder Way), the totem poles at the entrance to the site from the A1120 onto Gateway Boulevard and the respective unit signage.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier applications included approved advertisement consents for illuminated totem signs, retained signs, alternative signage and Plot 1600 signage.

“REF: DC/22/00349 Application for Advertisement Consent - Erection of 2No illuminated totem signs. DECISION: GTD 25.03.2022”

“REF: DC/24/00619 Application for Advertisement Consent - Erection of totem poles and display of illuminated and non illuminated hoardings and fascia signage (part retention of). DECISION: GTD 08.08.2024”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the temporary, non-illuminated sign would match existing signs and would not harm amenity or public safety.

“The signage relates specifically to the Stowmarket Innovation Gateway. Signs of this scale and type would not be out of character for marketing purposes, and the sign would match those already approved on the site. Given the temporary nature of the proposed sign and its siting within the development, they do not give rise to any demonstrable adverse impact on the character of the locality.”

“The sign is not to be illuminated and therefore it would not result in significant harm to existing residential amenity.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Highways and environmental health raised no objection, while the town council had not responded.

“Stowmarket Town Council Comments No response received to date.”

“Environmental Health - Noise/Odour/Light/Smoke Comments Received - 20/10/2025 No objection.”

Officer report

Public representations

No letters, emails or online comments had been received when the report was prepared.

“At the time of writing this report no letters/emails/online comments have been received. An update shall be provided as necessary either via Tabled Papers or verbally at the meeting.”

Officer report

Member discussion

Members debated the temporary nature of the sign.

“The Case Officer provided details of this application within the presentation for the previous item, DC/25/04635.”

“Members debated the application on issues including the temporary nature of the sign.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee authorised advertisement consent with approved plans, standard advert conditions, a five-year display period and an informative note.

“1) That the Chief Planning Officer be authorised to GRANT advertisement consent subject to conditions as summarised below and those as may be deemed necessary by the Chief Planning Officer:”

“Approved plans • Standard advert conditions (requiring that the signage is erected with landowner permission, does not harm amenity or block traffic signage, is maintained in good condition, does not create a public safety hazard and that the site is returned to its original condition once removed) • Time period for display (five years)”

Minutes

Sources

  • Babergh Mid Suffolk Mid Suffolk Planning Committee minutes, 19 November 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Babergh Mid Suffolk's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 19 November 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
6 for, 1 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →