Micro energy storage project at Verge At Progress Way Mid Suffolk Business Park, Eye
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk Mid Suffolk Planning Committee on 14 Jan 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed constructing and operating a micro energy storage system with battery cabinets, electrical equipment, a concrete base and security fencing.
“Development of Description Full Planning Application - Construction and operation of a micro energy storage project…”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The system would occupy a 72-square-metre grass verge in a business park beside utility infrastructure, about 100 metres from the nearest home.
“The proposed development consists of the installation and operation of a micro energy storage system (ESS), known as a "Battery Box", on a 72 square metre grass verge within the Mid Suffolk Business Park.”
“It is positioned directly adjacent to existing utility infrastructure, including an Anglian Water pumping station and an electrical substation, and is accessed via Progress Way, an internal estate road serving the wider business park.”
Officer report
Planning history
There was no relevant planning history and no previous committee resolution or member site visit.
“Previous Committee/ Resolution: None Previous Member Site Visit: None Call in request from Council Member: None…”
Officer report
The officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended approval because the proposal supported energy infrastructure in a suitable business-park location without significant adverse impacts, subject to conditions.
“This proposal for a micro energy storage system has been assessed against the Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan (2023), the Eye Neighbourhood Plan (2021), and the relevant provisions of the NPPF. The development is considered acceptable in principle, being located within an established business park and adjacent to existing utility infrastructure.”
“In planning balance, the proposal delivers clear public benefits in terms of supporting energy infrastructure and climate objectives, with no significant adverse impacts identified. The development is considered to comply with the development plan and national policy.”
Officer report
Public representations
No letters, emails or online comments had been received at the time of the report.
“At the time of writing this report no letters/emails/online comments have been received. It is the officer opinion that this represents no objections, no neutral comments and no support comments. An update shall be provided as necessary either via Tabled Papers or verbally at the meeting.”
“All individual representations are counted and considered. Repeated and/or additional communication from a single individual will be counted as one representation.”
Officer report
Who spoke
The committee considered representations from the agent and the ward member.
Members’ debate
Members questioned fire safety, extinguishment systems, decommissioning, an undisclosed pipeline, battery replacement, hedgerow retention and evacuation arrangements.
“The Case Officer responded to questions from Members on issues including: the Fire Safety Management Plan and proposed fire extinguishment systems, any decommissioning plans for the site, the details of the undisclosed pipeline mentioned by the Health and Safety Executive, the planning requirements should the batteries require replacing, and whether the retention of the existing surrounding hedgerow is included in the conditions.”
“The Area Planning Manager responded to a question from Members regarding whether there was a requirement for a fire evacuation plan.”
Minutes
The vote
A proposal to approve the application was seconded and passed unanimously.
“Councillor Hadingham proposed that the application be approved as detailed in the Officer recommendation. Councillor Lawrence seconded the proposal.”
Minutes
The final decision
Planning permission was granted with conditions covering construction, noise, biodiversity, restoration, connection, fire safety and emergency access, plus informatives.
“That Members resolve to GRANT planning permission subject to the following conditions and informatives and any others as may be deemed necessary by the Chief Planning Officer:”
“Standard time limit • Approved Plans • Construction Management Plan including hours of operation • Post-Installation Noise Validation Report • Biodiversity Enhancement Measures & Landscaping • Decommissioning and Site Restoration • Connection Agreement • Fire Safety Management Plan • Emergency Access and Water Supply…”
Minutes
Sources
- Babergh Mid Suffolk Mid Suffolk Planning Committee minutes, 14 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Babergh Mid Suffolk's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Babergh Mid Suffolk
- Date
- Wednesday 14 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Babergh Mid Suffolk committee decisions →
This committee's year
12 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.