New driveway at 2 Orpins Close, Brabourne, Ashford
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Ashford Planning Committee on 20 Aug 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought a new driveway from an existing dropped kerb, providing hardstanding for two vehicles.
“The application seeks planning permission for the creation a new driveway to serve the property off the existing dropped kerb access from The Lees Close. The driveway would measure a maximum of 7 metres in width and 15 metres in depth.”
“The reasons for the proposed new driveway and off-street parking area are cited as being the limited turning space available when multiple vehicles are parked within the cul-de-sac at Orpins Close. The existing access to the property at No. Orpins Close is via Orpins Close and is understood to require crossing 3rd Party Land (part of the driveway of No.1 Orpins Close).”
Officer report
The site
The dwelling is a modern detached home on a corner plot beside residential properties, existing accesses and two protected ash trees.
“The application site comprises of a modern detached two-storey dwelling located within the built confines of the village of Barbourne accessed via Orpins Close as well as part of an existing access/parking area beyond the southern boundary of the property located between Nos. 15-20 The Lees Close (which is within the ownership of Ashford Borough Council). The surrounding area is residential, characterised by a mix of terrace and semi- detached residential properties.”
“The dwelling occupies a corner plot at the end of Orpins Close which is a residential cul-de-sac. There are two Ash trees subject to Tree Preservation Order (TPO) No.8 1990 within the site adjacent to the property’s boundary with No.18 The Lees Close.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the proposal would not materially harm the area’s appearance, neighbours’ amenity or highway safety.
“It is stated as part of the application, that there would be space for vehicles to turn within the site, but the width of the site would not be sufficient to enable either of the cars parked within the spaces proposed to enter and leave the site in forward gear without at least some difficulty. It is noted that concerns have been raised locally regarding the highway safety and access issues the proposal may cause.”
“The proposed creation of an area of hardstanding for the purpose of vehicular parking would be acceptable as it would not cause harm to the character and appearance of the street scene, residential amenity or highway safety. It is therefore recommended that the application is approved.”
Officer report
What people said
The parish council objected, while six neighbour letters raised concerns about safety, access, parking, character, flooding, future use and trees.
“Highway and pedestrian safety and access concerns • Concerns raised regarding future use of the access • Property already has an access and driveway off Orpins Close • Adverse impact on the character and appearance of the existing cul-de-sac of The Lees Close • Would increase wear and tear and flooding • Objection to tree planting proposed…”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee refused the application because intensified use of the access would create conflicts affecting parking, vehicles, pedestrians and nearby residents’ amenities.
“The development would have an adverse impact on the ability of residents of 13-18 The Lees Close to park outside their homes in an acceptable manner and cause obstruction or conflict with the use of a vehicular access route serving 19 & 20 The Lees Close. The proposal would give rise to an intensified vehicular use of that access route which would lead to conflicts involving parked vehicles, moving vehicles and pedestrians in close proximity.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
“On the following grounds: The development would have an adverse impact on the ability of residents of 13-18 The Lees Close to park outside their homes in an acceptable manner and cause obstruction or conflict with the use of a vehicular access route serving 19 & 20 The Lees Close. The proposal would give rise to an intensified vehicular use of that access route which would lead to conflicts involving parked vehicles, moving vehicles and pedestrians in close proximity.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Ashford Planning Committee minutes, 20 August 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Ashford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Ashford Planning Committee
- Council
- Ashford
- Date
- Wednesday 20 August 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Ashford committee decisions →
This committee's year
9 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.