Replacement dwelling at Marian, Llanddeusant
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Anglesey Planning and Orders Committee on 1 Apr 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed demolishing the existing dwelling and adjoining structures, building a replacement dwelling and installing a new treatment plant.
“Description: Full application for demolishing the existing dwelling and adjoining structures, erection of a replacement dwelling together with the installation of a new treatment plant at…”
Officer report
The site
The site is in isolated open countryside surrounded by grazing fields, with access from a long track leading to dwellings at Elim.
“The application site is located in an isolated, open countryside surrounded by fields used to graze animals. Access to the site is via a long track that leads up to a cluster of dwellings in Elim.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
An earlier application for an agricultural machinery storage shed at the site was permitted in May 2024.
“DAG/2024/4 - Application to determine whether prior approval is required for the erection of an agricultural shed for storage of machinery on land at - Marian, Llanddeusant – Permit 1/5/24”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended approval because repairing the existing dwelling was less economically feasible than rebuilding, and the design would integrate into the landscape.
“The fourth criteria confirms that outside development boundaries the existing dwelling is not capable of retention through renovation and extension and/or demonstrated that the repair of the existing building is not economically feasible.”
“The cost of refurbishing the existing dwelling is far greater than the cost of rebuilding a new dwelling and it is therefore considered that it is more economically feasible to demolish the existing dwelling and re- build a new dwelling. The proposal complies with the fourth criteria.”
Officer report
Design and effects
The larger replacement dwelling would be about five metres from the existing footprint, with officers finding no significantly greater visual or residential impact.
“The replacement dwelling is not on the same footprint as the existing dwelling; however, it is located approximately 5m away from the footprint of the existing dwelling and located on the footprint part of the stone outbuilding that is to be demolished. It is not considered that moving the dwelling approx. 5m to the North West will have any greater visual or amenity impact than the location of the existing dwelling.”
“The application proposes an increase in scale and massing compared to the existing dwelling, however, the design of the replacement dwelling will integrate into the landscape due to the design and high quality of the dwelling. The scale and design of the replacement dwelling will not create a visual impact significantly greater than the existing dwelling and complies with criteria seven of Policy TAI13.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Ecology, highways and drainage consultees supported the proposal subject to conditions, while other listed consultees gave no response or standard comments.
“Consultee Response Polisi Cynllunio / Planning Policy No response Dwr Cymru/Welsh Water No response Draenio / Drainage Confirmation SuDS approval required and confirmation no concerns of flooding within the area. Ymgynghorydd Ecolegol ac Amgylcheddol / Ecological and Environmental Advisor Satisfied with biodiversity enhancements and conditional approval recommended.”
“GCAG / GAPS Conditional Approval Priffyrdd a Trafnidiaeth / Highways and Transportation Conditional Approval. Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru / Natural Resources Wales Dim ymateb Swyddog Hawliau Tramwy Cyhoeddus/ Public Rights of Way Officer Standard Comments and confirmation that the development will not impact the PROW. Cynghorydd Jackie Lewis No response Cynghorydd Llio Angharad Owen No response Cynghorydd Kenneth P.”
Officer report
Public representations
Letters were sent to immediate neighbours, a site notice was displayed and a newspaper advertisement was placed; no letters had been received when reported.
“The planning application was advertised by distributing letters to immediate neighbours. The expiry date to receive representations is the 06/10/25. A site notice was placed near the site and an advertisement in the local newspaper due to a PROW located within the red line of the application site. At the time of writing the report no letters of representation had been received.”
Officer report
Committee discussion
The Planning Development Manager explained the policy assessment and recommendation, and a councillor supported approval with another councillor seconding it.
“The Planning Development Manager reported that the application is for the demolition of an existing dwelling and adjoining structures together with the erection of a new dwelling and the installation of a new sewage treatment plant.”
“The Planning Development Manager further said that the proposal is a moderate increase of approximately 30% compared to the existing dwelling, however, the new dwelling will integrate into the landscape due to its design and high quality. The scale and design of the property will have no greater visual impact than the existing dwelling; and it complies with criterion seven in Policy TAI 13. The other criteria do not apply.”
Minutes
Sources
- Anglesey Planning and Orders Committee minutes, 1 April 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Anglesey's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Anglesey
- Date
- Wednesday 1 April 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Anglesey committee decisions →
This committee's year
48 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.