Land Adjacent Addingham Cricket Ground Ilkley Road Addingham West Yorkshire LS29 0LT Data via plota.co.uk

26/02592/MAF - Major Full Application Pending Consideration

Proposal

Demolition of existing building on site and the construction of 55 dwellings, along with associated access off Main Street, internal access roads, open space, landscaping and other associated infrastructure Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
around 3 Aug 2026
✓
Consultation
26 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 2 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 5 Nov 2026; it is now day 67.

Comments are open until 5 Nov 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Documents 37

Statements & assessments 18

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 9

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Addingham conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Public footpath 9 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Bradford and South Pennines; Radon affected area, class 2; Scheduled monument 234 m away: Anglo-Saxon cemetery and medieval manorial centre including fishponds and part of the open field system adjacent to St Peter's Church; National landscape 386 m away: Nidderdale.
Not affected
No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Bradford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Bradford
Application type
Major Full Application
Postcode
LS29 0LT
Received
around 3 Aug 2026
Validated
3 Aug 2026
Ward
Ilkley & Addingham (Ward 15)
Parish
Addingham Parish Town Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Nov 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Stantec

Decision outlook

Day 67, past Bradford's usual 56 days for demolitions. 90% are decided within thirteen weeks, so most likely by 2 Nov 2026.

Day 6728 days to the predicted decision (day 95)
78%decided within 8 weeks
91%approved
152decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Bradford in the last twelve months, from validation. Bradford decision record →

Public comments

237comments received
227 objecting1 neutral9 supporting

96% object · above the UK average of 75%

20 neighbours consulted · Last counted 1 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14857387
Planning Portal ref
PP-14857387
Neighbours
28 Aug 2026
Consultation
26 Aug 2026
Comments by
5 Nov 2026
Site or press notice
15 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Nov 2026
Env. assessment
No
Bradford
Planning Authority Score
3.9/10
Below average
#195 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Bradford ranks #192 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Bradford decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #188 of 296
89%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #200 of 296
58%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #192 of 296
40%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #148 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
252 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
22 decided (10+ homes)
76%
Change of use approved
101 decided
2,322
Total decisions
323 refused in the year to March 2026