Unit 2C Corton WoodBrampton Bierlow 9999 Data via plota.co.uk

RB2026/1011 Approved

Proposal

Change of use of existing restaurant (Use Class E) to drive-thru restaurant (Use Class E / Sui Generis); including external alterations & extensions, new bin store, creation of drive-thru lane, external plant, landscaping & car parking reconfiguration Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 14 Oct 2026, 04:24

Application progress

✓

Received

15 Jul 2026

✓

Approved

7 Oct 2026

Approved on 7 Oct 2026 · Delegated (Part 2B) · Last checked 7 Oct 2026

Documents 1

Site constraints 5

Coal mining development high risk area

Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.

From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.

Coal mining risk assessments ↗

Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone

Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.

Also on the record

Radon affected area, class 2; Nature improvement area: Dearne Valley Green Heart; Inside the Brampton (Rotherham) built-up area.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rotherham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

12 Oct 2026Pending

18 Lundhill Grove, Wombwell, Barnsley, S73 0QZ

Reduce Ash tree T7 back away from dwelling by 1.5m within TPO 2/1998.

2026/0878

Important details

Council: Rotherham
Postcode: S73 0UF
Received: 15 Jul 2026
Validated: 15 Jul 2026
Ward: Hoober Ward
Parish: Brampton Bierlow
Case officer: Show
Decision: GRANTED CONDITIONALLY
Decision date: 7 Oct 2026
Decision level: Delegated (Part 2B)
Applicant: Show
Agent: Lichfields

How this decision compares

Decided in 84 days from validation, 31 days slower than Rotherham's median of 53 for changes of use. Approved, as 86% of changes of use here are.

This one84d

Council53d

UK56d

62%decided within 8 weeks

86%approved

6%go to committee

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Rotherham in the last twelve months, from validation. Rotherham decision record →

Public comments

2comments received

Last counted 6 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation: 22 Jul 2026
Comments by: 30 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry: 9 Oct 2026

Rotherham

Planning Authority Score

4.7/10

Below average

#167 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Change of use

Rotherham ranks #107 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Rotherham is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 71% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils

only 71% approved vs 90% nationally

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

Rotherham decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

79%

Overall approval rate

Below avg (87%) #266 of 296

71%

Householder approved

Below avg (90%) #295 of 296

72%

Decided in 8 weeks

Above avg (63%) #107 of 296

32%

Extended time limit

Below avg (41%) #68 of 296

78%

Minor dwellings approved

63 decided (1-9 homes)

100%

Major dwellings approved

20 decided (10+ homes)

83%

Change of use approved

58 decided

750

Total decisions

156 refused in the year to March 2026