Land adjoining 73 Buchanan Road Upper Arncott OX25 1PE Data via plota.co.uk

25/02641/PIP - Permission in Principle Refused

Proposal

Permission in principle - Erection of a minimum of six and a maximum of nine dwellings Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
7 Oct 2025
✓
Validated
8 Sept 2026
✗
Refused
23 Oct 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 23 Oct 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 23 Oct 2026

Documents 67

Consultation & comments 62

PDF Consultation Response Document · 16 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 15 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 15 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 13 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 13 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 13 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 13 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 12 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 12 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 9 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 9 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 5 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 5 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 5 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 16 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 16 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 7 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 4 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 3 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 2 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 1 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 31 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 31 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 30 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 30 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 30 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 30 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 30 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 30 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 30 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 29 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 29 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 28 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Public Comments Document · 24 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 20 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response Document · 20 Oct 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 5

Public restricted byway about 11 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats - NEZ
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Upper Arncott built-up area; Priority habitat about 19 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Cherwell - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Cherwell
Application type
Permission in Principle
Postcode
OX25 1PE
Received
7 Oct 2025
Validated
8 Sept 2026
Ward
Launton And Otmoor
Parish
Arncott
Case officer
Show
Target decision
14 Oct 2026
Decision
Refused
Decision date
23 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
JCPC Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 45 days from validation, 26 days faster than Cherwell's median of 71 for new homes. Refused, as 33% of new homes here are.

33%decided within 8 weeks
67%approved
62decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Cherwell in the last twelve months, from validation. Cherwell decision record →

Public comments

39comments received

Last counted 23 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
21 Oct 2026
Cherwell
Planning Authority Score
3.6/10
Below average
#214 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Cherwell is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #247 out of 296. 49% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cherwell decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #77 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #101 of 296
47%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #247 of 296
49%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #218 of 296
77%
Minor dwellings approved
117 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
96%
Change of use approved
47 decided
1,091
Total decisions
90 refused in the year to March 2026