The High Nature Centre East Portlemouth TQ8 8PN Data via plota.co.uk

1113/26/VAR - Variation or Removal of Condition Under Consideration

Proposal

Variation of conditions of permission for the Construction of roundhouse and siting of five yurts to be used in association with nature holiday enterprise. Provision of additional facilities for educational, recreational and business activities together with associated carparking landscaping works Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
23 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
24 Aug 2026
Decision
Target date was 19 Oct 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 19 Oct 2026.

The consultation period closed on 8 Oct 2026.

Documents 62

Consultation & comments 46

PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Dr J. Cox - Objection · 12 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response - External National Landscape obs · 9 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Jodie Teare - Objection · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Jodie Teare · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Robert Scarr - Objection · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Ruth Froud - Objection · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Adrian Parker - Objection · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection South Hams Society - Objection · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Lindsey Lindley - Objection · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Planning Comment Attachment · 8 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF East Portlemouth Parish Council - Objection Consultation Response - Parish · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter of Representation - Comment Marcus Nolan - Comment · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection A Jones - Objection · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Jane Miller - Objection · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Robin Piggott - Objection · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection John Miller - Objection · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Joe Froud - Objection · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Rachel Roberts - Support · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Andy Johnson - Support · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Zachary Young - Support · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Miriam Sawday - Support · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support George Clinton - Support · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Rosy Prowse - Support · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response - Internal EHO Comments High Nature · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Vicky - Objection · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection A R Gibson - Objections · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Laura Mitchell - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Lorna lawford - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Lucy Baggott - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support andrea goring - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Rosemary Speed - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Kathryn Sheasby - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Pat Sykes - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Nikki Ellis - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Joss Webber - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Nicola Renovich - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Katie Hampden-Smith - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Patrick Trinick - Support · 6 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Liz Millard - Objection · 5 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Sallie Rutledge - Support · 3 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Thomas Douglas - Support · 3 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Hall - Support · 3 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Belinda Yannic - Objection · 25 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Support Nick reilly - Support · 24 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Letter Of Representation - Objection Ruth Froud - Objection · 14 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF Consultation Response - External DCC LLFA · 8 Sept 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Variationcouncil archive
    • VariationVariation of conditions for the Construction of roundhouse and siting of five yurts to be used…This application1113/26/VAR

Site constraints 6

1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: High House Farmhouse, Grade II, about 27 m from the postcode pin
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
South Devon National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Heritage coast about 30 m away: South Devon.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Hams - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
South Hams
Application type
Variation or Removal of Condition
Postcode
TQ8 8PN
Received
23 Apr 2026
Validated
24 Aug 2026
Ward
Stokenham
Parish
East Portlemouth
Case officer
Show
Applicant
Show
Agent
Terra Perma

Public comments

42comments received
19 objecting1 neutral22 supporting

52% support · above the UK average of 16%

Last counted 25 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
7 Sept 2026
Comments by
8 Oct 2026
South Hams
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#89 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Hams is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #97 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Hams decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #116 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #165 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #97 of 296
32%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #69 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
130 decided (1-9 homes)
70%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
26 decided
1,018
Total decisions
101 refused in the year to March 2026