Land adj Dell Cottage Ladyfield Road Kiveton Park 9999 Data via plota.co.uk

RB2026/0034 Approved

Proposal

Erection of self-build detached dormer bungalow Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
4 Feb 2026
✓
Approved
9 Jun 2026

Approved on 9 Jun 2026 · Delegated (Part 2A) · Last checked 23 Sept 2026

Site constraints 9

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Thorpe Salvin conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
National infrastructure project about 591 m away: Whitestone Solar Farm
The site is about 591 m from the project boundary. Generating station, accepted for examination.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; 1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin; Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Thorpe Salvin built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 19 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rotherham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rotherham
Received
9 Jan 2026
Validated
4 Feb 2026
Ward
Anston & Woodsetts Ward
Parish
Thorpe Salvin
Decision
GRANTED CONDITIONALLY
Decision date
9 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated (Part 2A)

How this decision compares

Decided in 125 days from validation, 55 days slower than Rotherham's median of 70 for new homes. Approved, as 75% of new homes here are.

46%decided within 8 weeks
75%approved
7%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Rotherham in the last twelve months, from validation. Rotherham decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
14 Jan 2026
Comments by
12 Mar 2026
Rotherham
Planning Authority Score
4.7/10
Below average
#167 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rotherham ranks #107 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Rotherham is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 71% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 71% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rotherham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
79%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #266 of 296
71%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #295 of 296
72%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #107 of 296
32%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #68 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
63 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
58 decided
750
Total decisions
156 refused in the year to March 2026