land at Moor Lane South Ravenfield Data via plota.co.uk

RB2025/1672 Approved

Proposal

Application to vary condition 01(approved plans) imposed by application RB2025/0602 to allow changes to the Construction Management/Phasing Plan Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
23 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
24 Dec 2025
✓
Approved
19 Feb 2026

Approved on 19 Feb 2026 · Proposed to be Delegated · Last checked 14 Oct 2026

Documents 1

Decision & officer reports 1

PDF Decision Notice Document · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

Surface water flood risk
4 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 2-14, Main Street, Grade II, about 29 m from the postcode pin · 4 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 4 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Ravenfield conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Surface water flood riskCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 1269 m away: Whitestone Solar Farm; Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rotherham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

9 Sept 2026Pending

Rowan Lodge Hooton LaneRavenfield 9999

Partial demolition of conservatory and erection of single storey rear extension

RB2026/1241
17 Aug 2026Approved

7 St James ViewRavenfield 0007

Application to undertake works to trees within Ravenfield Conservation Area

RB2026/1133

Important details

Council
Rotherham
Received
23 Dec 2025
Validated
24 Dec 2025
Ward
Bramley & Ravenfield Ward
Parish
Bramley
Case officer
Show
Decision
GRANTED CONDITIONALLY
Decision date
19 Feb 2026
Decision level
Proposed to be Delegated
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 57 days from validation, 44 days faster than Rotherham's median of 101 for full applications. Approved, as 100% of full applications here are.

24%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
21decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Rotherham in the last twelve months, from validation. Rotherham decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
5 Jan 2026
Comments by
11 Feb 2026
Site or press notice
15 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
25 Mar 2026
Rotherham
Planning Authority Score
4.7/10
Below average
#167 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rotherham ranks #107 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Rotherham is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 71% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 71% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rotherham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
79%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #266 of 296
71%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #295 of 296
72%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #107 of 296
32%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #68 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
63 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
58 decided
750
Total decisions
156 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings