Condition variation at Royal Pavilion Gardens, Brighton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Brighton And Hove Planning Committee on 1 Oct 2025.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
What was proposed
The application sought removal or variation of a condition at Royal Pavilion Gardens, Pavilion Buildings, Brighton.
“BH2025/01627 - Royal Pavilion Gardens, Pavilion Buildings, Brighton - Removal or Variation of Condition…”
“The case officer introduced the application to the committee.”
Minutes
The site and project
The gardens are grade II listed, and the project focuses on heritage enhancements, including opening up original John Nash views.
“Councillor Pickett was informed that the viability of the scheme was an issue and on balance the application to vary condition 4 was acceptable. 17 trees are to be removed, and 13 new trees planted by condition, with more expected in the landscaping on site. The Estate Regeneration Project Manager noted that the main focus of the project was to be the heritage aspects of the scheme.”
“Councillor Earthey was informed that the scheme would open up the original John Nash views.”
Minutes
Earlier approval and changes
The scheme was approved in 2023; the ecological solutions remained the same, and there were no landscaping changes to the approved scheme.
“Councillor Winder was informed that the scheme was approved in 2023, and the ecological solutions remain the same. The project ecologist confirmed that the habitat units required to be provided as per the current BNG metric are higher than those required in the original metric, but when the application was originally approved in 2023.”
“Councillor Theobald was informed that there were no changes to the approved scheme, in respect of the landscaping.”
Minutes
Views on the application
Members were told there were no objections, while funding conditions required money to be used for on-site improvements.
“Councillor Cattell was informed that the funding was tight, there are conditions attached on the funding which should be used for on-site improvements.”
“Councillor Cattell noted there were no objections and the changes were minimal. There was no need to refuse. The councillor supported the application.”
Minutes
The committee vote
The committee voted unanimously to grant planning permission.
“A vote was held, and the committee agreed unanimously to grant planning permission.”
Minutes
The final decision
Planning permission was granted subject to the conditions and informatives in the report.
“RESOVLED: That the Committee has taken into consideration and agrees with the reasons for the recommendation set out in the report and resolves to GRANT planning permission subject to the Conditions and Informatives in the report.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
“Councillor Parrott agreed with other Members and noted that the regulations going forward would be changing. 13.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Brighton And Hove Planning Committee minutes, 1 October 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Brighton And Hove's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Brighton And Hove Planning Committee
- Council
- Brighton And Hove
- Date
- Wednesday 1 October 2025
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Brighton And Hove committee decisions →
This committee's year
28 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.