4 Pix Road, Stotfold, Hitchin, SG5 4HU Data via plota.co.uk

CB/26/01959/FULL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Garage conversion with window insertion and cladding with replacement roof over garage and porch, chimney removal and insertion of roof lantern (retrospective) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
18 Jun 2026
✓
Validated
5 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
23 Sept 2026

Approved on 23 Sept 2026 · Last checked 18 Oct 2026

Site constraints 1

Also on the record
Inside the Stotfold built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 3

Last sold for £350,000 in September 2025. Detached house, freehold.

12 September 2025£350,000
16 March 1998£33,800
9 May 1995£33,000

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Building

Floor area85 m² (915 sq ft)
Energy ratingD (63 out of 100), could reach C
PropertyDetached bungalow, 3 habitable rooms
Built1950 to 1966
HeatingBoiler and radiators, mains gas
WallsCavity wall, filled cavity

From the energy performance certificate lodged in January 2020, the latest held for this property, matched to this application by its address. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
SG5 4HU
Received
18 Jun 2026
Validated
5 Aug 2026
Parish
Stotfold
Case officer
Show
Target decision
30 Sept 2026
Decision
Full Application - Granted Conditions or Reasons: View Conditions or Reasons Informative Notes: 1 )Reasons for Granting The site comprises a detached bungalow at 4 Pix Road Stotfold, constructed of facing brickwork and a tiled roof and white uPVC and aluminum fenestration. The site lies within an established residential area characterised by a mix of both single-storey and two-storey properties. The application property is set within a row of three bungalows of similar scale and design. The proposal seeks permission for garage conversion with window insertion and cladding with replacement roof over garage and porch, chimney removal and insertion of roof lantern. Some of the proposed works have already been implemented. As 'retrospective' describes the timing of the application rather than the act of development, that word has been omitted from the description of development. The works are located to the front of the dwelling and are clearly visible within the streetscene. The replacement flat roof over the garage and porch is marginally higher than that it replaced and projects above the bungalow's eaves, incorporating a roof lantern. Horizontal white Upvc cladding has been added above the entrance door and beneath the garage roof, with a black Upvc fascia board above. The submitted plans also show that the garage door being infilled with brickwork and a ground floor window inserted, although these works have not yet been carried out. Given that the existing garage parapet already extends above the bungalow's eaves, and having regard to the limited scale of the alterations, the works are not considered to result in unacceptable harm to the character or appearance of the dwelling or the surrounding area. The removal of the two chimney stacks is also not considered visually harmful. As the works are not yet completed a materials condition can be attached. No. 2 Pix Road is a detached bungalow located to the west of the application site. Given the separation distance between the properties, their relationship, and the modest scale of the proposed roof alterations, the development is not considered likely to result in any undue loss of light, loss of privacy, or overbearing impact on the occupiers of that neighbouring property. Following internal alterations, a new ground floor bathroom window is proposed within the west elevation which could be undertaken under permitted development rights, and in any event, would be adequately screened by the existing boundary fencing. No other surrounding properties would be adversely affected. The existing dwelling contains two bedrooms and, in accordance with the adopted parking standards, requires the retention of two parking spaces. Whilst only one parking space would remain on the frontage hardstanding following the conversion of the integral garage, no additional bedrooms are proposed. Furthermore, the conversion of the garage could potentially be undertaken under permitted development rights and, therefore, would not in itself warrant refusal of the application. The application is retrospective in nature.�� Policy DM8.2 of the NPPF indicates that where consideration is being given to a retrospective planning application,� substantial weight should be given to any evidence indicating that the unauthorised development was carried out intentionally. There is no substantive evidence that the development was carried out intentionally to avoid planning control. Therefore, limited weight is given to the fact that the development has already taken place. A commencement condition is unnecessary because the development has already been carried out.� Neighbouring properties have been consulted on the application and no comments have been received. Stotfold Town Council were consulted and have no objection to the proposal. In light of the foregoing appraisal, it is considered that the proposal would be in accordance with Policy HQ1 of the Adopted Central Bedford shire Local Plan (2021), the Adopted Central Bedford shire Design Guide (August 2023), and Policy DP3 of the NPPF (2026).Reasons for Granting The site comprises a detached bungalow at 4 Pix Road Stotfold, constructed of facing brickwork and a tiled roof and white uPVC and aluminum fenestration. The site lies within an established residential area characterised by a mix of both single-storey and two-storey properties. The application property is set within a row of three bungalows of similar scale and design. The proposal seeks permission for garage conversion with window insertion and cladding with replacement roof over garage and porch, chimney removal and insertion of roof lantern. Some of the proposed works have already been implemented. As 'retrospective' describes the timing of the application rather than the act of development, that word has been omitted from the description of development. The works are located to the front of the dwelling and are clearly visible within the streetscene. The replacement flat roof over the garage and porch is marginally higher than that it replaced and projects above the bungalow's eaves, incorporating a roof lantern. Horizontal white Upvc cladding has been added above the entrance door and beneath the garage roof, with a black Upvc fascia board above. The submitted plans also show that the garage door being infilled with brickwork and a ground floor window inserted, although these works have not yet been carried out. Given that the existing garage parapet already extends above the bungalow's eaves, and having regard to the limited scale of the alterations, the works are not considered to result in unacceptable harm to the character or appearance of the dwelling or the surrounding area. The removal of the two chimney stacks is also not considered visually harmful. As the works are not yet completed a materials condition can be attached. No. 2 Pix Road is a detached bungalow located to the west of the application site. Given the separation distance between the properties, their relationship, and the modest scale of the proposed roof alterations, the development is not considered likely to result in any undue loss of light, loss of privacy, or overbearing impact on the occupiers of that neighbouring property. Following internal alterations, a new ground floor bathroom window is proposed within the west elevation which could be undertaken under permitted development rights, and in any event, would be adequately screened by the existing boundary fencing. No other surrounding properties would be adversely affected. The existing dwelling contains two bedrooms and, in accordance with the adopted parking standards, requires the retention of two parking spaces. Whilst only one parking space would remain on the frontage hardstanding following the conversion of the integral garage, no additional bedrooms are proposed. Furthermore, the conversion of the garage could potentially be undertaken under permitted development rights and, therefore, would not in itself warrant refusal of the application. The application is retrospective in nature.�� Policy DM8.2 of the NPPF indicates that where consideration is being given to a retrospective planning application,� substantial weight should be given to any evidence indicating that the unauthorised development was carried out intentionally. There is no substantive evidence that the development was carried out intentionally to avoid planning control. Therefore, limited weight is given to the fact that the development has already taken place. A commencement condition is unnecessary because the development has already been carried out.� Neighbouring properties have been consulted on the application and no comments have been received. Stotfold Town Council were consulted and have no objection to the proposal. In light of the foregoing appraisal, it is considered that the proposal would be in accordance with Policy HQ1 of the Adopted Central Bedford shire Local Plan (2021), the Adopted Central Bedford shire Design Guide (August 2023), and Policy DP3 of the NPPF (2026). 2 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications. 3 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 4 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.
Decision date
23 Sept 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 49 days from validation, 5 days faster than Central Bedfordshire's median of 54 for extensions. Approved, as 90% of extensions here are.

77%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
100%go to committee

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Central Bedfordshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Central Bedfordshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 18 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
5 Aug 2026
Comments by
16 Sept 2026
Central Bedfordshire
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#88 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Central Bedfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #218 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #169 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #62 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #99 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
153 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
29 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
45 decided
1,444
Total decisions
226 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.