36 Common Road, Stotfold, Hitchin, SG5 4DB Data via plota.co.uk

CB/26/02542/FULL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Erection of a single storey rear extension and window alterations Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
7 Sept 2026
✓
Approved
21 Oct 2026

Approved on 21 Oct 2026 · Last checked 22 Oct 2026

Site constraints 1

Also on the record
Inside the Stotfold built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
SG5 4DB
Received
17 Aug 2026
Validated
7 Sept 2026
Parish
Stotfold
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Nov 2026
Decision
Full Application - Granted Conditions or Reasons: View Conditions or Reasons Informative Notes: 1 )Reasons for Granting: The application site comprises a semi-detached, two-storey dwelling situated on a corner plot to the north of Common Road, Stotfold. No. 36 is constructed of brickwork with a tiled gable roof, and currently benefits from a single-storey side and rear projection, with a single detached garage to the northeast. The proposal consists of the erection of a single-storey rear extension and alterations to fenestration. The proposed extension would have a maximum depth of 3.4 metres, a width of 3.6 metres, a height to the eaves of 2.5 metres and a mono-pitched roof to a maximum height of 3.5 metres. On the basis of scale and design, the proposed extension would be retained to the rear of the property and sited partially within the footprint of the existing rear projection and hardstanding. The development would form a proportionate addition to the host-dwelling which would be constructed of materials to match and as such would not result in any harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposed fenestration changes are also retained to the rear of the property and would be considered minor alterations to the dwelling, which would not give rise to a material impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling or wider area. Regarding the siting of the proposal, the most potentially impacted neighbouring dwellings are deemed to be No. 1 Castles Close and No. 38 Common Road. In terms of neighbouring amenity, the proposed rear extension would be sited adjacent to the shared boundary with No. 38, retaining a separation distance of approximately 2.3 metres, and would surpass the rear elevation of this neighbouring dwelling by some 0.5 metres. Given this relationship, and the existing built form at the application site, the proposal is not considered to give rise to an overbearing impact or loss of light to this neighbouring dwelling. To the east, No. 1 Castles Close, would remain separated from the proposal by approximately 14.5 metres and would be largely screened from the works by the detached garage to the northeast of the application site. Therefore the development would not result in any impact on the amenities of this neighbouring property. The proposal does not create any additional bedrooms and therefore would not be required to demonstrate further onsite parking. The proposal would not adversely affect the existing parking or access arrangements at the application site and would therefore be acceptable on a like-for-like basis. Stotfold Town Council were consulted on this application and raised no objections. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 11 of Central Bedfordshire Design Guide, Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and Chapter 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).Reasons for Granting: The application site comprises a semi-detached, two-storey dwelling situated on a corner plot to the north of Common Road, Stotfold. No. 36 is constructed of brickwork with a tiled gable roof, and currently benefits from a single-storey side and rear projection, with a single detached garage to the northeast. The proposal consists of the erection of a single-storey rear extension and alterations to fenestration. The proposed extension would have a maximum depth of 3.4 metres, a width of 3.6 metres, a height to the eaves of 2.5 metres and a mono-pitched roof to a maximum height of 3.5 metres. On the basis of scale and design, the proposed extension would be retained to the rear of the property and sited partially within the footprint of the existing rear projection and hardstanding. The development would form a proportionate addition to the host-dwelling which would be constructed of materials to match and as such would not result in any harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposed fenestration changes are also retained to the rear of the property and would be considered minor alterations to the dwelling, which would not give rise to a material impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling or wider area. Regarding the siting of the proposal, the most potentially impacted neighbouring dwellings are deemed to be No. 1 Castles Close and No. 38 Common Road. In terms of neighbouring amenity, the proposed rear extension would be sited adjacent to the shared boundary with No. 38, retaining a separation distance of approximately 2.3 metres, and would surpass the rear elevation of this neighbouring dwelling by some 0.5 metres. Given this relationship, and the existing built form at the application site, the proposal is not considered to give rise to an overbearing impact or loss of light to this neighbouring dwelling. To the east, No. 1 Castles Close, would remain separated from the proposal by approximately 14.5 metres and would be largely screened from the works by the detached garage to the northeast of the application site. Therefore the development would not result in any impact on the amenities of this neighbouring property. The proposal does not create any additional bedrooms and therefore would not be required to demonstrate further onsite parking. The proposal would not adversely affect the existing parking or access arrangements at the application site and would therefore be acceptable on a like-for-like basis. Stotfold Town Council were consulted on this application and raised no objections. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 11 of Central Bedfordshire Design Guide, Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and Chapter 14 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 2 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications. 3 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 4 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. 6 )Will a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bandsWill a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bands
Decision date
21 Oct 2026

How this decision compares

Decided in 44 days from validation, 10 days faster than Central Bedfordshire's median of 54 for extensions. Approved, as 90% of extensions here are.

77%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
100%go to committee

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Central Bedfordshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Central Bedfordshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 22 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
7 Sept 2026
Comments by
9 Oct 2026
Site or press notice
18 Sept 2026
Central Bedfordshire
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#88 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Central Bedfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #218 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #169 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #62 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #99 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
153 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
29 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
45 decided
1,444
Total decisions
226 refused in the year to March 2026