Double-glazed timber windows at 87 Golborne Road, Kensington, London W10
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Kensington And Chelsea Planning Applications Committee on 6 Oct 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed replacing single-glazed timber windows with double-glazed timber windows, retaining the existing openings, proportions and glazing arrangements.
“4.2The proposed replacement windows would be purpose-made timber windows with double-glazed sealed units, achieving a proposed U-value of 1.4 W/m²K or better in accordance with Building Regulations. The replacement windows would retain the existing window openings and would broadly maintain the established dimensions, proportions and glazing arrangements of the existing fenestration.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a 19th-century mixed-use building with a shopfront below and residential accommodation above, forming part of a traditional streetscape.
“/PP/25/02050:2 3.The site and its surroundings 3.1This application relates to 87 Golborne Road, LONDON, W10 5NL, a mixed-use property comprising a commercial shopfront at ground-floor level with residential accommodation above. 3.2The building dates from the 19th century and has an established traditional appearance, with timber windows forming part of the architectural character of the upper floors.”
Officer report
Planning history
There was no relevant planning history, although the application formed part of several window-replacement applications on Golborne Road.
“4.5There is no relevant planning history relating to the site, although it is noted that this application forms part of several applications submitted for replacement windows/upgrading to properties within Golborne Road.”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers considered that the proposal would preserve the building and streetscape, maintain acceptable relationships with neighbours and comply with planning policies.
“The proposal would preserve the character and appearance of the host property and wider streetscape, would maintain an acceptable relationship with nearby residential properties, and would comply with the relevant policies of the Development Plan. No objections were received during the consultation period. The application is reported to Planning Committee as the applicant is the [the applicant] of Kensington and Chelsea.”
Officer report
Main planning issues
The main issues were the effect on the property and streetscape and whether neighbouring occupiers would retain acceptable living conditions.
“Therefore, the proposals would be in accordance with Local Plan Policy CD16, and a Planning Fire Safety Strategy would not be required in this instance. 6.3The decisive issues are: i. Whether the development would preserve the character and appearance of the host property and wider streetscene; and ii. Whether the development would maintain acceptable living conditions for neighbouring occupiers.”
“/PP/25/02050:4 U-value of 1.4 W/m²K or better. 6.6The replacement windows would not introduce new openings or alter the scale, massing or architectural composition of the building. The works would therefore represent a sympathetic improvement to the existing fenestration and would not result in harm to the character or appearance of the host property or the wider streetscene. The proposal therefore accords with Local Plan Policies CD1, CD2 and CD13.”
Officer report
Consultation response
No letters were received in support of or objection to the application.
“/PP/25/02050:5 Comments from interested parties 8.1The application was advertised in the Gazette on 17/07/2026. A statutory notice advertising the application was posted near the site on 17/07/2026. 8.2No letters were received in support or objection to the application. 9.Recommended conditions if the application is granted. 1.Time limit (Full PP) The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.”
Officer report
Committee decision
The committee granted planning permission in accordance with the recommendation.
“Details GRANTED, in accordance with the recommendation.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Anne CyronVice-ChairConservative
- Sam MackoverVice-ChairConservative
- Aarien AretiConservative
Source: Plota analysis of the council's record of attendance; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Kensington And Chelsea Planning Applications Committee minutes, 6 October 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Kensington And Chelsea's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Kensington And Chelsea
- Date
- Tuesday 6 October 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 3Conservative 3Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Kensington And Chelsea committee decisions →
This committee's year
215 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 12 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.