Flat extensions at Basement Flat, 99 Buckingham Road, Brighton

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Brighton And Hove Planning Committee on 4 Feb 2026.

BH2025/02255Approved

What was proposed

The application sought a front porch, rear conservatory and single-storey rear extension with associated works.

“Planning permission is sought for the erection of a front porch extension, rear conservatory extension and single storey rear extension with associated works.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The lower-ground-floor flat is in a five-storey semi-detached building within the West Hill Conservation Area, with a large garden and access to garages.

“OFFRPT 2.1. The application relates a lower ground floor flat, within a five-storey semi- detached building, located on the southern side of Buckingham Road and within the West Hill Conservation Area. The site is subject to an Article 4 direction which removes householder permitted development rights.”

“The overall plot is larger than typical for the area and has an unconventional shape as it includes vehicle access to the side, which leads to a row of three garages set back from the road. The rear of the garages marks the boundary to St Nicholas playground to the south. Behind the main house at 99 Buckingham Road is a large residential garden; the rear garden boundary of the site forms the rear boundaries of residential properties in St Nicholas Road.”

Officer report

Consultation and objections

The County Archaeologist had no comments, while seven interested parties objected on grounds including ecology, privacy, heritage, boundaries, trees and overdevelopment.

“Eight (8) letters of representation have been received from seven (7) interested parties objecting to the application for the following reasons: • The land is adjacent to a formal burial ground • Impact on archaeology…”

“OFFRPT • Impact on wildlife and ecology • Light pollution • Loss of green space • Loss of privacy and overlooking • Loss of light and overshadowing • Noise and disturbance • Maintenance issues for adjoining properties • Impact on adjoining boundary walls and retaining walls • Detrimental impact on conservation area and historic boundary walls • Harmful impact on the adjoining play area • Overdevelopment • No pre-application consultation with neighbours • Changes the garden…”

Officer report

What members did

The application was not called for discussion, so there was no recorded committee debate or speaker contribution.

“This application was not called for discussion. The officer recommendation was therefore taken as having been agreed unanimously.”

Minutes

The decision and conditions

Planning permission was granted subject to approved drawings, matching materials, ecological measures and restricting the flat roof to maintenance or emergency access.

“That the Committee has taken into consideration and agrees with the reasons for the recommendation set out below and resolves to GRANT planning permission subject to the following Conditions and Informatives:”

“Access to the flat roof over the extension hereby approved shall be for maintenance or emergency purposes only and the flat roof shall not be used as a roof garden, terrace, patio or similar amenity area. Reason: In order to protect adjoining properties from overlooking and noise disturbance and to comply with Policies DM20 and DM21 of Brighton & Hove City Plan Part 2.”

Officer report

Sources

  • Brighton And Hove Planning Committee minutes, 4 February 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Brighton And Hove's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 4 February 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

53 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →