11 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST Data via plota.co.uk
CB/26/00181/FULL - Full Application
Approved
Proposal
Erection of a two storey side and single storey rear extensions with roof lights. Demolition of garage Data via plota.co.uk
Track application
Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes.
Alerts nearby
Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked
Application progress
✓
Received
20 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
2 Feb 2026
✓
Approved
19 Mar 2026
Approved on 19 Mar 2026 · Last checked 13 Oct 2026
Site constraints 3
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 112 m away: The Grand Union Canal Transfer, at pre-application; 1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin; Inside the Leighton Buzzard built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site
Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.
Building
Floor area87 m² (936 sq ft)
Energy ratingD (65 out of 100), could reach B
PropertySemi-detached house, 5 habitable rooms
Built1950 to 1966
HeatingBoiler and radiators, mains gas
WallsCavity wall, filled cavity
From the energy performance certificate lodged in May 2025, the latest held for this property, matched to this application by its address. The building may have changed since. View the certificate
Work with planning data?
About Plota's data serviceEvery application in Central Bedfordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.
Nearby new applications
20 Oct 2026Pending
The Golden Bell, 5 Church Square, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 1AE
Discharge of Conditions 3 and 4 against planning permission ref: CB/25/03002/LB
2 Oct 2026Pending
8 Southcourt Road, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2QF
Part garage conversion, loft conversion with rear dormers and front roof lights
25 Sept 2026Pending
Land South Of Leighton Road Three Locks Soulbury Buckinghamshire
Request for an EIA Screening Opinion under Regulation 6 of the Town and Country ...
21 Sept 2026Pending
Byworths House, Vicarage Road, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2LP
Replacement of timber sash windows and doors with hardwood timber sash windows a...
9 Sept 2026Pending
37 Golden Riddy, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2RH
Single storey side/front, and single storey side/rear extensions
2 Sept 2026Pending
Vernons Garage, Station Approach, Station Road, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2LY
Lawful Development Certificate Existing: lawful use of the building as a vehicle...
Important details
- Council
- Central Bedfordshire
- Application type
- Full Application
- Postcode
- LU7 2ST
- Received
- 20 Jan 2026
- Validated
- 2 Feb 2026
- Parish
- Leighton-Linslade
- Case officer
- Show
- Target decision
- 30 Mar 2026
- Decision
- Full Application - Granted Conditions or Reasons: View Conditions or Reasons Informative Notes: 1 )Reasons for Granting: The application site is a two-storey, semi-detached dwelling located on Harcourt Close, Linslade and is constructed of brickwork, featuring white render, with a hipped tile roof. The proposal consists of the erection of a two-storey side extension and a single-storey rear extension following the demolition of a detached garage to the north of the site. To the side, the two-storey extension would have a depth of 8.2 metres, a width of 2.6 metres, a height to the eaves of 5.2 metres and an overall hipped roof height to some 7.9 metres. To the rear, the single-storey extension would have a depth of 2 metres, a width of 8.7 metres, a height to the eaves of 2.7 metres and a maximum mono-pitched roof height of some 3.3 metres. The overall footprint of the property would increase by approximately 135 square metres and would see an increase in floorspace of some 212 square metres. Harcourt Close is characterised by two-storey, semi-detached dwellings of varied age and design. Front, side and rear extensions across the streetscene are noted and therefore the proposal is not considered to be at odds with the existing grain and pattern of development. Furthermore, many properties across Harcourt Close benefit from similar schemes of a two-storey side extension and single-storey rear extension. On the basis of its design and scale, while it is accepted that the proposal would be a relatively large addition, the extension would remain a proportionate addition to the existing dwellinghouse. The two-storey addition to the north elevation is set down some 0.2 metres from the ridge line of the existing dwelling, and set back some 0.6 metres from the existing principle elevation and as such the proposal would be considered a subservient addition. The single-storey extension would be sited to the rear of the property where it is not readily visible within the streetscene and would be considered a proportionate addition to the host dwelling. Additionally, all proposed extensions would be constructed in materials to match that of the existing dwellinghouse and as such would harmonise with its existing built form and would not be considered to result in harm to the character and appearance of the area. Overall the proposal, although noted to be of substantial size, would not be considered to give rise to any detrimental impacts on the character and appearance of the surrounding area. Regarding the siting of the proposal, the most potentially impacted neighbouring dwellings are deemed to be No.12 and No.10 Harcourt Close. In terms of neighbouring amenity, the rear extension would be set on the boundary with No.10 and would extend beyond the rear elevation of this property by 2 metres. The combined form of development would result in a degree of enclosure along the shared boundary, nevertheless, this relationship is partly derived from No.10's existing built form and therefore is considered acceptable in this regard. Given the modest eaves height and single storey nature of the rear extension, this part of the proposal is unlikely to give rise to any detrimental impact on neighbouring amenity. The proposed rear extension includes the instillation of three rooflights, the rear elevation faces onto a public right of way, and therefore there would be no material impact on neighbouring residential amenity in terms of overlooking or loss of privacy. The two-storey side extension would be set some 2.1 metres from the built form of neighbouring dwelling No.12 Harcourt Close. The proposal would result in an increase of built form along this boundary, however, the extension would not project beyond the established built line formed by this neighbouring dwellings' existing side and rear extension. Given the sufficient separation distance of the two-storey addition, and the absence of any first-floor windows facing this neighbour, it is not considered that any adverse impact on neighbouring amenity would arise. The proposal includes the installation of a first-floor window to the front elevation of the dwelling, this would face onto Harcourt close and would not overlook any private amenity spaces, as such it would not result in any unacceptable loss of outlook, overbearing impact, or loss of privacy. The proposal would increase the number of bedrooms in the dwelling from three to four. As shown on plan DD 25/194.2 Rev A, there is sufficient parking arrangements for three spaces at the property and adequate parking has been retained in line with the parking standards SPD. Leighton-Linslade Town Council were consulted on this application and raised no objection subject to the proposed parking arrangement meeting parking standards. The Committee also raised the matter of grey water runoff from hard surfacing, however this would be matter for Building Control. Both highway and drainage considerations have been taken into account within the determination of this application. Ecology were consulted on this application and expressed no objections, there were comments raised regarding the possibility of roosting bats and nesting birds, and as such informatives have been added to this application in line with the Conservation of habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended) and the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), to remind the applicant of their relevant responsibilities. The Rights of Way Officer was consulted on this application and raised no objection. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. As the site is present within the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, Natural England were consulted but have raised no comments. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 11 of Central Bedfordshire Design Guide, Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).Reasons for Granting: The application site is a two-storey, semi-detached dwelling located on Harcourt Close, Linslade and is constructed of brickwork, featuring white render, with a hipped tile roof. The proposal consists of the erection of a two-storey side extension and a single-storey rear extension following the demolition of a detached garage to the north of the site. To the side, the two-storey extension would have a depth of 8.2 metres, a width of 2.6 metres, a height to the eaves of 5.2 metres and an overall hipped roof height to some 7.9 metres. To the rear, the single-storey extension would have a depth of 2 metres, a width of 8.7 metres, a height to the eaves of 2.7 metres and a maximum mono-pitched roof height of some 3.3 metres. The overall footprint of the property would increase by approximately 135 square metres and would see an increase in floorspace of some 212 square metres. Harcourt Close is characterised by two-storey, semi-detached dwellings of varied age and design. Front, side and rear extensions across the streetscene are noted and therefore the proposal is not considered to be at odds with the existing grain and pattern of development. Furthermore, many properties across Harcourt Close benefit from similar schemes of a two-storey side extension and single-storey rear extension. On the basis of its design and scale, while it is accepted that the proposal would be a relatively large addition, the extension would remain a proportionate addition to the existing dwellinghouse. The two-storey addition to the north elevation is set down some 0.2 metres from the ridge line of the existing dwelling, and set back some 0.6 metres from the existing principle elevation and as such the proposal would be considered a subservient addition. The single-storey extension would be sited to the rear of the property where it is not readily visible within the streetscene and would be considered a proportionate addition to the host dwelling. Additionally, all proposed extensions would be constructed in materials to match that of the existing dwellinghouse and as such would harmonise with its existing built form and would not be considered to result in harm to the character and appearance of the area. Overall the proposal, although noted to be of substantial size, would not be considered to give rise to any detrimental impacts on the character and appearance of the surrounding area. Regarding the siting of the proposal, the most potentially impacted neighbouring dwellings are deemed to be No.12 and No.10 Harcourt Close. In terms of neighbouring amenity, the rear extension would be set on the boundary with No.10 and would extend beyond the rear elevation of this property by 2 metres. The combined form of development would result in a degree of enclosure along the shared boundary, nevertheless, this relationship is partly derived from No.10's existing built form and therefore is considered acceptable in this regard. Given the modest eaves height and single storey nature of the rear extension, this part of the proposal is unlikely to give rise to any detrimental impact on neighbouring amenity. The proposed rear extension includes the instillation of three rooflights, the rear elevation faces onto a public right of way, and therefore there would be no material impact on neighbouring residential amenity in terms of overlooking or loss of privacy. The two-storey side extension would be set some 2.1 metres from the built form of neighbouring dwelling No.12 Harcourt Close. The proposal would result in an increase of built form along this boundary, however, the extension would not project beyond the established built line formed by this neighbouring dwellings' existing side and rear extension. Given the sufficient separation distance of the two-storey addition, and the absence of any first-floor windows facing this neighbour, it is not considered that any adverse impact on neighbouring amenity would arise. The proposal includes the installation of a first-floor window to the front elevation of the dwelling, this would face onto Harcourt close and would not overlook any private amenity spaces, as such it would not result in any unacceptable loss of outlook, overbearing impact, or loss of privacy. The proposal would increase the number of bedrooms in the dwelling from three to four. As shown on plan DD 25/194.2 Rev A, there is sufficient parking arrangements for three spaces at the property and adequate parking has been retained in line with the parking standards SPD. Leighton-Linslade Town Council were consulted on this application and raised no objection subject to the proposed parking arrangement meeting parking standards. The Committee also raised the matter of grey water runoff from hard surfacing, however this would be matter for Building Control. Both highway and drainage considerations have been taken into account within the determination of this application. Ecology were consulted on this application and expressed no objections, there were comments raised regarding the possibility of roosting bats and nesting birds, and as such informatives have been added to this application in line with the Conservation of habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended) and the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), to remind the applicant of their relevant responsibilities. The Rights of Way Officer was consulted on this application and raised no objection. The application was subject to public consultation and no representations were received. As the site is present within the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, Natural England were consulted but have raised no comments. The proposal is therefore considered to be in accordance with Policies HQ1, T2 and T3 of the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan, Section 11 of Central Bedfordshire Design Guide, Parking Standards for New Developments SPD and Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 2 )The site is located within the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC). Natural England have not provided any comments on this application, however, as no additional independent overnight accommodation is proposed, the proposal is not considered to have a detrimental impact upon the SAC.The site is located within the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC). Natural England have not provided any comments on this application, however, as no additional independent overnight accommodation is proposed, the proposal is not considered to have a detrimental impact upon the SAC. 3 )Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications.Based on information submitted there are no known issues raised in the context of Human Rights / The Equalities Act 2010 and as such there would be no relevant implications. 4 )The applicant is reminded that, under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended (section 1), it is an offence to remove, damage, or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest is in use or being built.� Planning consent for a development does not provide a defence against prosecution under this actThe applicant is reminded that, under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended (section 1), it is an offence to remove, damage, or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest is in use or being built.� Planning consent for a development does not provide a defence against prosecution under this act 5 )The applicant is reminded that, under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended) and the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), it is an offence to: deliberately capture, disturb, injure, or kill bats; damage or destroy a breeding or resting place; obstruct access to their resting or sheltering places; intentionally or recklessly disturb a bat while it's in a structure or place of shelter or protection.The applicant is reminded that, under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended) and the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended), it is an offence to: deliberately capture, disturb, injure, or kill bats; damage or destroy a breeding or resting place; obstruct access to their resting or sheltering places; intentionally or recklessly disturb a bat while it's in a structure or place of shelter or protection. 6 )GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).GDP Policy Informative Central Beds Local Plan In accordance with Article 35 (1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the reason for any condition above relates to the Policies as referred to in the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). 7 )This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority.This permission relates only to that required under the Town & Country Planning Acts and does not include any consent or approval under any other enactment or under the Building Regulations. Any other consent or approval which is necessary must be obtained from the appropriate authority. 8 )Will a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bandsWill a new extension affect your Council Tax Charge? The rate of Council Tax you pay depends on which valuation band your home is placed in. This is determined by the market value of your home as at 1 April 1991. Your property's Council Tax band may change if the property is extended.� The Council Tax band will only change when a relevant transaction takes place. For example, if you sell your property after extending it, the new owner may have to pay a higher band of Council Tax. If however you add an annexe to your property, the Valuation Office Agency may decide that the annexe should be banded separately for Council Tax.� If this happens, you will have to start paying Council Tax for the annexe as soon as it is completed. If the annexe is occupied by a relative of the residents of the main dwelling, it may qualify for a Council Tax discount or exemption.� Contact the Council for advice on 0300 300 8306. The website link is: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/council-tax-bands
- Decision date
- 19 Mar 2026
- Agent
- Show
How this decision compares
Decided in 45 days from validation, 9 days faster than Central Bedfordshire's median of 54 for demolitions. Approved, as 84% of demolitions here are.
This one45d
Council54d
UK56d
71%decided within 8 weeks
84%approved
173decided in the last year
Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Central Bedfordshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Central Bedfordshire decision record →
Public comments
No public comments yet.
Last counted 13 Oct 2026
Consultation & key dates
- Consultation
- 2 Feb 2026
- Comments by
- 11 Mar 2026
- Site or press notice
- 13 Feb 2026
Historical activity at this location
15 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Within ~100m
Nearby activity
2025
Approved
7 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Erection of single storey rear and side extension. Demolition of existing outbuilding.
2023
Approved
Treetops, Bossington Lane, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2TB
Non-material amendment to planning permission CB/22/04489/FULL (Single storey front exten…
2022
Approved
Treetops, Bossington Lane, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2TB
Single storey Front Extension
2022
Approved
20 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Two storey side extension, single storey rear extension and a loft conversion.
2020
Refused
7 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Detached dwelling house
2020
Approved
2 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Two storey side and single storey rear extension
2020
Withdrawn
7 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Detached dwellinghouse
2019
Approved
Kwee Beck, Bossington Lane, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2TB
Non Material Amendment: to Planning permission 19/00828/FULL - Proposed removal of garage…
2019
Approved
Kwee Beck, Bossington Lane, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2TB
Proposed removal of garage and erection of single storey front & rear extension.
2019
Approved
19 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Proposed two storey side extension and single storey rear extension. New front first floo…
2017
Approved
23 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Single storey side and rear extensions, new roof to side elevation, glass canopy over sto…
2017
Approved
1 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Single storey rear extension.
2016
Approved
17 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Demolish existing garage and erect a two storey & single storey side extension
2016
Approved
17 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Prior Notification Householder Extension: Erection of single storey rear extension 6.0m b…
2016
Approved
12 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
Demolition of existing garage and erection of part single storey and part two storey side…
Central Bedfordshire
Planning Authority Score
6.3/10
Average
#88 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions
Central Bedfordshire is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #62 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).
Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application.
View full council performance
Central Bedfordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #218 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #169 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #62 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #99 of 296
61%
Minor dwellings approved
153 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
29 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
45 decided
1,444
Total decisions
226 refused in the year to March 2026
Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.
Track this application
11 Harcourt Close, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 2ST
✓
Tracking this application
Not there after a minute? Check your junk folder. It's from alerts@plota.co.uk.
Go to your dashboard →Sign in to view contact details
Applicant and case-officer names are hidden from public view for privacy. Create a free Plota account - or sign back in - and we'll show them, plus you get a dashboard for alerts and tracked applications.
