Land Between 338 Chatsworth Road and Mill Lane Chatsworth Road Chesterfield Derbyshire Data via plota.co.uk

CHE/25/00612/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Demolition of existing buildings (retention of main public house building) and erection of a drive through restaurant and commercial units with associated works Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
15 Aug 2025
✓
Validated
21 Aug 2025
✓
Approved
12 Mar 2026

Approved on 12 Mar 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 13 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Chesterfield Planning Committee on 9 Mar 2026. Earlier deferred on 26 Jan 2026.

Approved

  • Officers advised refusal because the scheme conflicted with housing policies and harmed the conservation area and listed building setting.
  • Supporters welcomed regeneration and jobs, while objections covered traffic, flooding, trees, access, housing and opening hours.
  • The committee voted 7–3 for approval and granted permission with sales to the public starting at 7am.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site and history, officers’ assessment, public views, committee debate, vote and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Chesterfield's committee minutes of 9 Mar 2026.

Documents 120

Consultation & comments 83

PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 26 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER Consultee Comment · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSERVATION OFFICER COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 7 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 29 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 23 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF DERBYSHIRE WILDLIFE TRUST COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 16 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF CLLRS SNOWDON & KELLMAN Consultee Comment · 8 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF HISTORIC ENGLAND COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 7 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 5 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 5 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 2 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 2 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 28 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 25 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 25 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 25 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF DESIGN SERVICES STORM BABET FIGURES Consultee Comment · 25 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 24 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 24 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 24 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF DCC ARCHAEOLOGIST COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 24 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 23 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF CBC CLIMATE CHANGE OFFICER Consultee Comment · 23 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 23 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 23 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 22 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 22 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 20 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 20 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 19 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF CYCLE CHESTERFIELD COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF YORKSHIRE WATER COMMENT Consultee Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENT AGENCY COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 18 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF COAL AUTHORITY COMMENT Consultee Comment · 17 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 17 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 15 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UNIT COMMENT Consultee Comment · 15 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF RESIDENT COMMENT Public Comment · 15 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER Consultee Comment · 9 Sept 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
1 listed building within 150 m
Nearest: Mill Buildings at Walton Works, Grade II*, 43 m away
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Heritage at risk 42 m away: Walton Works, Walton Fields Road, Brampton; Flood defence 23 m away (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 30 year flood); Inside the Chesterfield built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 13 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chesterfield - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Received
15 Aug 2025
Validated
21 Aug 2025
Ward
Brampton East & Boythorpe
Case officer
Show
Target decision
16 Oct 2025
Decision
Conditional permission
Decision date
12 Mar 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Stainton Planning

How this decision compares

Decided in 203 days from validation, 117 days slower than Chesterfield's median of 86 for full applications. Approved, as 89% of full applications here are.

37%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
19%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Chesterfield in the last twelve months, from validation. Chesterfield decision record →

Public comments

66comments received
3 objecting1 neutral62 supporting

94% support · above the UK average of 16%

18 neighbours consulted · Last counted 13 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
26 Sept 2025
Statutory expiry
16 Oct 2025
Env. assessment
No
Chesterfield
Planning Authority Score
1.9/10
Poor
#275 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Chesterfield is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #267 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 56% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Chesterfield decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #126 of 296
89%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #201 of 296
40%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #267 of 296
56%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #253 of 296
96%
Minor dwellings approved
25 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
28 decided
345
Total decisions
39 refused in the year to March 2026