Land Between Mount Bovers Lane And Gusted Hall Lane, Main Road, Hawkwell, Essex, Data via plota.co.uk

25/00539/OUT - Outline Application Refused at committee

Refused at planning committee on 16 June 2026. The council has not issued its decision notice yet.

Proposal

Outline planning application (with all matters reserved except access to the site) for residential development including affordable housing (Class C3); a SEND/Community Facility (Classes F1 and F2); vehicular access from Main Road (with additional emergency vehicular access from Gusted Hall Lane); public open space; and associated infrastructure. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
18 Jul 2025
✓
Committee
16 Jun 2026
Decision notice
Not issued yet
Appeal
Appeal In Progress

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 29 Oct 2026; it is now day 468.

The consultation period closed on 27 Aug 2025.

Planning committee

Decided by Rochford Development Committee on 16 Jun 2026. The council has not yet issued its decision notice.

Refused unanimously

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised approval because the benefits were considered to outweigh the landscape harm, subject to conditions and obligations.
  • Objectors raised concerns about the Green Belt, landscape, infrastructure, transport, drainage and sewerage.
  • Members unanimously refused the application, citing landscape, Green Belt, connectivity and sewerage concerns.
Read how the committee decided The proposed development, officers’ advice, objections, speakers, committee debate, vote and reasons for refusal. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of Rochford's committee minutes of 16 Jun 2026.

Site constraints 7

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Priority habitat: Deciduous woodland
A habitat of principal importance. It shapes the ecology work and the biodiversity net gain a scheme has to show.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Local nature reserve about 230 m away: Hockley Woods
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats - NEZ
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
SSSI about 230 m away: Hockley Woods SSSI; 1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rochford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rochford
Application type
Outline Application
Received
18 Jul 2025
Validated
18 Jul 2025
Ward
Roche South Rochford District Council -
Parish
Hawkwell Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
17 Oct 2025

Decision outlook

Day 468, past the statutory target. 63% of outline applications in Rochford are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 23 Oct 2026.

Day 468412 days past the 56-day target
41%decided within 8 weeks
59%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for outline applications decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent outline applications in Rochford to go on. Rochford decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Planning Portal ref
PP-13935597
Comments by
27 Aug 2025
Committee
16 Jun 2026
Rochford
Planning Authority Score
3.2/10
Poor
#230 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Rochford is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #221 out of 296. Rochford is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 81% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 81% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rochford decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
79%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #265 of 296
81%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #275 of 296
53%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #221 of 296
36%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #112 of 296
62%
Minor dwellings approved
66 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
14 decided
472
Total decisions
98 refused in the year to March 2026